emzwopo

emzwopo — CS2 Stats

76561199072014725[U:1:1111748997]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

997Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,929Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,102Pink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7724 of 17890 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGemzwopoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,102 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning47
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42544Last 10042%Win rateLWTWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression5.6
Utility5.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time509ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–10
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD35122334%0.00
mirageB1991047%-0.01
nukeB147750%0.03
ancientA106460%0.02
dust2D93633%-0.03
infernoD82625%-0.03
anubisA53260%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

111,976Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
4,709Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band
48.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
10.3%Shot accuracy
17,662MVPs
2,913Hours (in match)
2,330Bombs planted
2,190Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,192
AWP24,071
MP91,505
FAMAS1,242
MAC-101,090

Lifetime map wins

5,613dust2
4,223inferno
3,844nuke
2,055vertigo
1,259train
937cbble
124office
36lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
526msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
5.66HE damage / grenade
20.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8276% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.0934%28 Aug
ancient13–100.1422%28 Aug
cache12–12-0.0421%27 Aug
anubis13–20.067%27 Aug
dust20–4-0.210%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0521%25 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0236%25 Aug
cache9–130.0324%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0221%24 Aug
cache13–50.0211%24 Aug
cache9–130.0326%23 Aug
cache0–13-0.0527%22 Aug
cache5–130.0531%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0019%22 Aug
cache4–8-0.0123%22 Aug
cache6–130.1132%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0126%21 Aug
cache10–13-0.0518%21 Aug
cache13–90.0125%20 Aug
cache13–30.0735%19 Aug
cache13–80.0434%18 Aug
cache4–13-0.0441%18 Aug
cache13–100.0118%17 Aug
cache8–10-0.0223%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.089%16 Aug
dust211–130.0115%16 Aug
ancient11–130.0423%16 Aug
nuke10–130.0022%15 Aug
dust213–70.0229%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0118%15 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0118%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.0924%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.090%13 Aug
ancient16–140.0022%13 Aug
inferno1–6-0.1014%13 Aug
nuke9–130.0629%12 Aug
cache16–14-0.0826%12 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0643%10 Aug
cache12–120.0330%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0919%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0418%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0217%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.078%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0316%7 Aug
dust213–20.1027%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0323%6 Aug
cache13–50.1126%6 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0249%6 Aug
nuke1–130.0229%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0219%4 Aug
nuke13–100.0526%4 Aug
nuke13–50.1131%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0735%3 Aug
inferno13–70.0937%3 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0033%1 Aug
nuke13–90.1339%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0723%1 Aug
mirage13–30.1231%31 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0332%31 Jul
ancient7–130.0225%29 Jul
nuke16–130.0320%29 Jul
nuke13–80.1320%29 Jul
cache13–16-0.0516%28 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0521%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0115%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.1118%28 Jul
cache2–13-0.0721%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.118%27 Jul
anubis13–20.0422%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.0220%27 Jul
cache9–13-0.0329%26 Jul
cache2–6-0.1143%26 Jul
ancient13–30.018%25 Jul
cache8–130.1221%16 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0875%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0219%16 Jul
cache11–130.0323%16 Jul
cache3–130.0130%16 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0322%14 Jul
cache12–120.0637%14 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0439%14 Jul
mirage7–30.028%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0922%14 Jul
ancient13–30.0726%13 Jul
nuke8–130.0139%13 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0219%13 Jul
nuke13–60.1028%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0714%13 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0327%13 Jul
cache13–9-0.0230%13 Jul
cache10–13-0.0236%13 Jul
cache13–110.0126%13 Jul
cache10–13-0.0328%13 Jul
cache12–12-0.0233%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0530%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0614%9 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0520%9 Jul
dust213–40.0922%9 Jul
mirage16–120.0220%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.058%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →