VɪKΛ — CS2 Stats

76561199069995780[U:1:1109730052]✓ No bans

625Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,542Hours in CS56Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,751Blue band · top ~35% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35217 of 54897 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate47.6%42.2%42.7%above
Shot accuracy13.5%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.900.981.000.10 short
Match win rate41.5%43.6%44.1%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVɪKΛFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,751 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning49
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression5.8
Utility1.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.9
Utility1.9
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time558ms−106ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — mirage 13–2
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS35231266%0.06
cacheC146843%0.02
dust2S128467%0.03
ancientA127558%0.04
anubisD123925%0.03
inferno42250%0.05
nuke42250%0.02
stronghold21150%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.03
italy110100%-0.03
office1010%-0.02
warden1010%0.01
alpine110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,163Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
3,259Matches
41.5%Match win rate
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
6,407MVPs
1,081Hours (in match)
1,875Bombs planted
443Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,171inferno
1,109dust2
528vertigo
437nuke
155cbble
136train
91lake
43office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
44%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
88.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1656%1.5121.2
Dust250%0.8013.0
Inferno4100%1.3818.5
Anubis30%0.8717.3
Train250%4.0016.0
Ancient2100%1.3819.0
Nuke10%0.406.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
557msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
5.18HE damage / grenade
1.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.489% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3187 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7844% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–16-0.0017%30 Aug
mirage13–50.1412%30 Aug
ancient13–160.0211%30 Aug
dust213–30.1018%30 Aug
cache13–9-0.0210%29 Aug
anubis16–140.086%29 Aug
anubis13–20.030%29 Aug
inferno7–130.0232%26 Aug
anubis14–160.055%23 Aug
mirage13–50.048%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0421%23 Aug
anubis11–130.0613%23 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0310%23 Aug
mirage13–10.038%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.045%20 Aug
anubis10–130.0310%20 Aug
dust216–14-0.0314%19 Aug
dust213–100.0820%19 Aug
ancient16–130.0511%19 Aug
dust213–60.0924%19 Aug
mirage13–60.015%18 Aug
anubis5–13-0.079%18 Aug
ancient13–70.029%18 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0314%17 Aug
inferno9–130.0414%17 Aug
dust213–70.089%17 Aug
mirage13–60.1118%16 Aug
mirage16–120.0711%16 Aug
dust216–120.0312%16 Aug
mirage13–60.1718%16 Aug
mirage13–20.267%16 Aug
mirage6–130.1316%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0310%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0310%16 Aug
anubis12–160.0317%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.057%14 Aug
anubis10–130.0021%13 Aug
cache11–130.0212%13 Aug
ancient11–130.0112%13 Aug
dust213–100.0511%13 Aug
nuke13–110.0918%13 Aug
nuke12–160.0115%12 Aug
nuke13–50.0717%12 Aug
inferno13–60.0312%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0327%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0614%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0513%10 Aug
ancient14–160.078%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0912%9 Aug
mirage13–60.1610%9 Aug
anubis8–130.0113%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0424%8 Aug
inferno13–40.1214%8 Aug
ancient13–110.007%6 Aug
dust22–70.0112%6 Aug
cache13–00.1324%6 Aug
cache11–130.0517%6 Aug
cache7–13-0.039%4 Aug
cache13–70.0112%4 Aug
cache15–150.1014%4 Aug
mirage7–130.0413%4 Aug
mirage16–120.039%2 Aug
mirage13–40.1314%2 Aug
anubis13–60.1017%2 Aug
cache13–110.0516%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0510%2 Aug
ancient13–70.096%2 Aug
ancient9–130.0011%1 Aug
cache13–80.0814%1 Aug
cache12–16-0.058%1 Aug
mirage13–50.0913%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0910%1 Aug
cache6–13-0.0724%1 Aug
cache8–130.0115%15 Jul
dust213–50.0318%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0611%12 Jul
mirage6–130.0314%8 Jul
mirage13–30.0515%7 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0411%6 Jul
anubis7–130.045%6 Jul
mirage8–130.0112%26 Jun
ancient13–30.0412%23 Jun
mirage13–100.1816%19 Jun
stronghold12–12-0.0112%16 Jun
italy13–7-0.036%16 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0413%14 Jun
dust24–13-0.0216%13 Jun
mirage16–130.1015%13 Jun
cache4–13-0.0111%12 Jun
mirage13–110.0810%12 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0313%12 Jun
ancient4–130.029%11 Jun
mirage13–100.0616%11 Jun
office11–13-0.0216%10 Jun
warden4–130.0114%10 Jun
mirage13–30.0610%7 Jun
stronghold13–6-0.019%7 Jun
cache13–70.0525%7 Jun
mirage12–120.057%7 Jun
alpine13–90.0715%6 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →