Dawg

Dawg — CS2 Stats

RU76561199062628030[U:1:1102362302]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

2,134Tracked matches26%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,290Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,551 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDawgFACEITLevel 8 · 1,551 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning52
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD315712Last 10031%Win rateLTLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.1
Aggression2.7
Utility7.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.2
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time631ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%+6.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–7
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7cacheWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D3682822%0.04
ancientC1761135%0.05
infernoD111109%0.03
mirageB115645%0.03
nukeA95456%0.05
anubisS75271%0.01
cacheD7070%0.03
train21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

44,996Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,416Matches
44.7%Match win rate
49.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
0.3%Shot accuracy
6,093MVPs
879Hours (in match)
2,061Bombs planted
573Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,305
MAC-102,095
MP91,538
AWP1,355
Knife625

Lifetime map wins

5,314dust2
2,748nuke
2,138inferno
2,090vertigo
747train
37office
13ar_shoots
7ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

340Matches
54%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
84.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10053%1.1116.0
Vertigo6363%1.0415.9
Anubis5157%1.0116.4
Dust24356%1.0816.0
Nuke2650%1.1617.9
Ancient1953%1.0115.7
Inferno1833%0.8715.4
Overpass1741%0.9414.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
624msReaction time
15.7%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
21.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.691% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0240%26 Aug
dust212–120.0736%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0920%1 Aug
dust24–13-0.0125%1 Aug
inferno5–130.0323%24 Jul
dust21–13-0.0317%24 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0523%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0222%21 Jul
ancient4–130.0016%21 Jul
ancient1–40.1164%21 Jul
mirage4–130.0026%20 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0513%20 Jul
ancient13–50.0141%20 Jul
cache6–13-0.0030%20 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0226%20 Jul
dust29–130.1327%19 Jul
dust213–90.1325%19 Jul
nuke13–110.1124%19 Jul
nuke12–120.0321%18 Jul
cache7–130.0827%18 Jul
nuke6–130.0416%17 Jul
dust212–120.1823%17 Jul
dust29–130.1128%16 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0121%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0022%15 Jul
cache3–130.0210%15 Jul
mirage3–130.0329%15 Jul
mirage3–130.1025%13 Jul
ancient13–70.1023%13 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0125%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0519%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0041%12 Jul
dust212–120.1421%11 Jul
ancient4–130.0422%11 Jul
cache5–130.0823%11 Jul
ancient5–130.0518%11 Jul
dust26–130.0031%11 Jul
dust29–130.0016%11 Jul
mirage7–130.0327%11 Jul
dust215–150.0430%10 Jul
cache8–130.0924%10 Jul
mirage13–40.0415%10 Jul
inferno2–130.0332%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0221%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.0435%10 Jul
nuke13–20.0424%10 Jul
ancient13–100.0229%10 Jul
dust23–13-0.0026%9 Jul
inferno9–130.0118%9 Jul
nuke2–130.0829%9 Jul
anubis13–90.0430%8 Jul
dust213–80.0619%8 Jul
dust213–70.2028%8 Jul
ancient13–110.0728%6 Jul
ancient13–70.0712%6 Jul
inferno3–130.0815%6 Jul
dust213–100.0517%6 Jul
ancient12–120.0519%4 Jul
dust22–13-0.0125%4 Jul
dust29–130.1517%4 Jul
dust20–130.0735%3 Jul
anubis8–130.0111%3 Jul
ancient12–120.1728%3 Jul
inferno1–130.0017%3 Jul
dust21–13-0.1117%2 Jul
train7–13-0.0732%2 Jul
dust22–13-0.0724%2 Jul
nuke16–130.0822%2 Jul
mirage14–160.0212%1 Jul
dust29–2-0.0616%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0014%1 Jul
anubis13–80.0312%1 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0022%1 Jul
dust25–13-0.038%1 Jul
dust213–50.0820%1 Jul
mirage13–80.0023%1 Jul
dust27–130.1018%1 Jul
ancient11–130.0529%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0219%30 Jun
dust211–13-0.0524%30 Jun
anubis13–50.0127%29 Jun
dust28–130.0121%28 Jun
dust26–130.0017%28 Jun
dust213–80.0221%28 Jun
ancient10–130.1618%28 Jun
dust213–100.0724%28 Jun
dust212–120.0526%27 Jun
dust212–120.0434%27 Jun
inferno9–130.0824%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0616%27 Jun
dust27–130.0717%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0020%27 Jun
anubis7–130.1114%26 Jun
nuke12–120.0519%26 Jun
train13–10-0.0218%26 Jun
dust20–13-0.0319%25 Jun
mirage13–50.0517%25 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0210%25 Jun
cache12–120.0213%25 Jun
inferno12–120.1317%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →