Kuma Lamar — CS2 Stats

76561199048710056[U:1:1088444328]

730Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
771Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate40.8%41.2%42.2%1.3% short
Shot accuracy8.5%12.5%11.9%3.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.600.960.980.38 short
Match win rate38.4%42.8%43.6%5.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 3 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKuma LamarFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning36
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44542Last 10044%Win rateWWWLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.3
Aggression4.7
Utility4.1
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 700ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning3.6
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time713ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 713ms
Headshot accuracy11.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — vertigo 9–5
133Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 15ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B168850%-0.01
ancientD1651131%-0.02
mirageA159660%-0.04
anubisA148657%-0.03
infernoD124833%-0.06
nukeD62433%-0.05
trainB63350%-0.03
vertigoB63350%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.15
office2020%-0.10
jura21150%-0.01
grail21150%0.01
cache1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,194Lifetime kills
0.60K/D
1,668Matches
38.4%Match win rate
40.8%Headshot %
8.5%Shot accuracy
2,122MVPs
771Hours (in match)
1,463Bombs planted
243Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,507vertigo
2,054dust2
1,044inferno
457nuke
252train
45lake
20office
12safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
30%Win rate
0.57Avg K/D
60.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient812%0.528.1
Vertigo862%0.6611.1
Anubis743%1.0210.1
Mirage520%0.669.8
Nuke40%0.396.5
Dust2367%0.7312.7
Inferno250%0.6711.0
Overpass1100%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.5%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
700msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
9.05HE damage / grenade
3.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5439% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 700.0203ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4727 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–7-0.117%22 Jul
anubis13–9-0.076%18 Jul
dust213–5-0.029%16 Jul
cache9–13-0.0813%15 Jul
anubis13–30.0515%15 Jul
inferno9–2-0.039%14 Jul
inferno0–9-0.280%8 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0610%2 Jul
dust213–30.0622%30 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0717%27 Jun
inferno10–13-0.087%25 Jun
anubis13–50.0523%25 Jun
ancient13–11-0.046%22 Jun
dust213–8-0.0214%20 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0321%20 Jun
anubis8–13-0.047%15 Jun
inferno10–130.0414%14 Jun
nuke13–110.0118%10 Jun
dust24–13-0.065%3 Jun
inferno13–30.0313%28 May
anubis8–13-0.0313%27 May
anubis13–7-0.049%27 May
dust22–13-0.0618%27 May
anubis4–13-0.038%15 May
mirage13–11-0.095%15 May
mirage9–13-0.069%6 May
overpass4–13-0.079%6 May
ancient14–16-0.0115%5 May
inferno16–12-0.0813%5 May
ancient0–3-0.020%5 May
dust28–13-0.057%5 May
mirage13–60.0113%27 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0620%25 Apr
inferno0–2-0.080%25 Apr
train3–13-0.140%23 Apr
train3–13-0.069%23 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0419%10 Apr
ancient13–7-0.064%10 Apr
ancient10–13-0.069%25 Mar
dust22–8-0.0713%25 Mar
anubis13–70.102%19 Mar
office10–13-0.1013%19 Mar
office10–13-0.106%19 Mar
nuke10–13-0.086%6 Mar
mirage0–13-0.090%6 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0713%2 Mar
dust213–30.0310%2 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0118%1 Mar
mirage2–130.0217%25 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0913%25 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0216%23 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0114%23 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0313%23 Feb
ancient10–13-0.079%23 Feb
anubis13–60.0414%23 Feb
ancient13–80.028%23 Feb
anubis6–13-0.1215%12 Aug
jura12–12-0.0222%5 Aug
jura13–7-0.0013%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0223%31 Jul
dust28–130.0618%28 Jul
ancient13–30.0310%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.039%24 Jul
inferno9–50.0325%24 Jul
train4–0-0.030%23 Jul
train13–8-0.0312%22 Jul
train7–130.0215%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.086%21 Jun
train13–90.052%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0915%21 Jun
mirage13–80.023%20 Jun
overpass3–9-0.220%19 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0413%18 Jun
vertigo9–5-0.009%20 May
vertigo2–9-0.197%19 May
inferno3–9-0.1018%19 May
nuke13–8-0.0412%19 May
dust213–110.1018%18 May
ancient11–130.0413%15 May
mirage3–13-0.1510%15 May
vertigo9–13-0.0711%11 May
dust213–100.0112%9 May
mirage13–60.1210%9 May
ancient4–13-0.078%9 May
grail13–40.0512%9 May
grail10–13-0.0317%9 May
dust212–12-0.034%5 May
nuke3–9-0.1019%28 Apr
inferno5–9-0.076%28 Apr
vertigo5–13-0.063%24 Apr
ancient1–13-0.054%24 Apr
ancient9–130.0410%23 Apr
vertigo13–80.0212%21 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0517%13 Apr
dust29–13-0.0410%12 Apr
ancient13–50.078%11 Apr
nuke1–13-0.0620%11 Apr
vertigo9–50.1815%11 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0224%8 Apr
dust213–90.0224%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →