Tickle Monster

Tickle Monster — CS2 Stats

76561199027991976[U:1:1067726248]Steam profile ↗

1,289Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating17,235Purple band · top ~19.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13329 of 23912 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

17,330Peak Premier on CSDB
1,194Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,194
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 95 below peak (17,330)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,765 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTickle MonsterPREMIER17,235 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,194csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning72
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLTWLWTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim7.5
Aggression10.0
Utility4.7
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.6
Clutch5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning7.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact1.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time582ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–5
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 74% over 19infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29141548%-0.00
dust2C25101540%0.02
ancientS1914574%0.01
infernoC114736%-0.00
nukeB84450%0.03
cache43175%-0.00
anubis42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
54%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
85.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%1.2517.5
Dust2825%1.4019.0
Anubis580%1.3616.6
Ancient475%1.2217.5
Nuke475%1.1814.5
Overpass367%1.4318.3
Cache333%0.7811.0
Inferno20%1.1021.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
583msReaction time
56.7%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
12.88HE damage / grenade
6.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0515%29 Aug
dust215–150.0625%29 Aug
mirage13–60.0524%29 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0224%28 Aug
dust213–5-0.0229%28 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0613%28 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0221%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0527%27 Aug
inferno13–40.0514%27 Aug
dust27–130.0325%27 Aug
ancient13–60.0610%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0119%27 Aug
nuke15–150.0315%27 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0120%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0721%26 Aug
ancient13–100.0114%26 Aug
dust26–130.0214%26 Aug
cache4–13-0.0111%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0113%25 Aug
ancient7–130.0916%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0923%25 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0322%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.019%24 Aug
mirage5–130.0228%24 Aug
nuke13–110.0128%23 Aug
dust29–130.0118%23 Aug
ancient13–50.0916%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0710%23 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0025%23 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0419%23 Aug
dust213–70.0824%23 Aug
inferno13–70.0418%23 Aug
anubis5–130.0336%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0213%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0318%22 Aug
cache13–10-0.0021%22 Aug
ancient6–130.0218%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0115%22 Aug
dust216–130.0426%22 Aug
dust28–130.0836%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0318%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0215%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0322%22 Aug
cache13–8-0.0323%22 Aug
inferno4–9-0.218%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0112%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0423%21 Aug
mirage13–40.0419%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0425%21 Aug
anubis13–10.0621%21 Aug
ancient13–70.0721%21 Aug
nuke13–70.0313%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0411%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0524%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0531%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0218%19 Aug
dust23–130.0225%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0227%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0621%16 Aug
ancient13–80.0012%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0315%16 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0215%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0420%15 Aug
dust211–130.0516%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0620%15 Aug
inferno2–130.0141%15 Aug
dust213–50.1323%15 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0217%15 Aug
dust27–130.0032%15 Aug
inferno9–130.0622%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0628%14 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0318%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0323%14 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0729%14 Aug
mirage13–80.0626%13 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0237%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0115%12 Aug
nuke8–130.1223%11 Aug
inferno4–130.0438%11 Aug
nuke7–130.0534%10 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0124%10 Aug
dust216–140.1125%10 Aug
dust213–50.0627%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0631%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0225%9 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0227%8 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0127%7 Aug
cache13–100.0319%7 Aug
dust213–16-0.0126%3 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0119%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0416%2 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0925%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0816%2 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0115%5 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0218%5 Jul
dust210–13-0.0020%5 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0613%4 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0327%4 Jul
dust213–100.0017%4 Jul
dust213–30.0522%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →