The Cute Curious Curiosity Cat — CS2 Stats

US76561198087106918[U:1:126841190]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

953Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,059Purple band · top ~12.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12192 of 25831 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning56

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–38–3Last 10059%Win rateLTWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2

Aggression5.9

Utility4.9

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch4.8

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time599ms+5ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–2

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 20nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	31	19–12	61%	0.02
dust2	S	20	13–7	65%	0.02
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.00
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.00
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches

45%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

75.7ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

13%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	13	62%	1.01	13.4
Dust2	11	36%	1.05	15.8
Inferno	8	38%	1.03	14.6
Cache	3	100%	1.14	16.7
Anubis	3	0%	0.69	15.7
Ancient	2	0%	0.62	13.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.64	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

598msReaction time

39.8%T opening success

38.7%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

2.0%Flash assists

9.93HE damage / grenade

3.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.479 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.8494% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	8–13	-0.00	21%	29 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.00	24%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.10	24%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	22%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.10	11%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	17%	28 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	18%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	24%	28 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	30%	28 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	14%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–1	-0.06	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	26%	28 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	15%	28 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	14%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.05	27%	27 Aug →
debris	4–9	-0.14	21%	27 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	9%	26 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.04	19%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	18%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.05	21%	23 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	8%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	14%	23 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	13%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.03	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	16%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	12%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	28%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	24%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.15	20%	18 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.04	21%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	20%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	38%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	23%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.02	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.05	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	27%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.03	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	9%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	18%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.02	22%	12 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.08	13%	12 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	14%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	10%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.05	10%	10 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	17%	10 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.00	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	18%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	33%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	27%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.07	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.11	21%	7 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	5–2	0.03	40%	7 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.01	10%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.04	28%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	6%	6 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	24%	6 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	19%	6 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.00	6%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	16%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.13	28%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	15%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	15%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	23%	3 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	21%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	0–2	-0.06	0%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.09	22%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.12	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	14%	2 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.10	31%	2 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	28%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	22%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	16%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	8%	1 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.15	14%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.04	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	13%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.10	13%	30 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	19%	28 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	25%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.12	22%	27 Jul →