hayato

hayato — CS2 Stats

76561199008729326[U:1:1048463598]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

613Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
992Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,384Purple band · top ~14.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21181 of 44544 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate45.2%44.2%47.1%1.9% short
Shot accuracy3.8%11.6%12.8%9.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.031.080.03 short
Match win rate49.2%45.2%46.6%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhayatoPREMIER18,384 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning44
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY593011Last 10059%Win rateWWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression3.6
Utility4.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.3

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time564ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — vertigo 13–2
130Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
W4Current streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2113862%0.02
dust2S1813572%0.01
infernoB158753%0.04
cacheB136746%0.02
trainC73443%0.03
nukeA74357%0.05
vertigoS75271%0.10
anubisC52340%0.00
ancient330100%-0.01
office32167%0.08
shelter1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,599Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
1,382Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Purple band
45.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
3.8%Shot accuracy
2,826MVPs
440Hours (in match)
1,366Bombs planted
297Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,504dust2
1,206inferno
965nuke
558train
342vertigo
271office
27italy
10cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
556msReaction time
19.8%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
6.32HE damage / grenade
11.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4683 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.8148% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.046%30 Aug
cache13–10-0.0219%29 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0132%29 Aug
train13–50.1124%28 Aug
dust28–13-0.0019%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0211%28 Aug
inferno13–50.0929%28 Aug
cache13–10.0419%28 Aug
cache10–13-0.0220%27 Aug
train6–130.0829%26 Aug
cache4–130.1124%26 Aug
cache4–13-0.0714%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0513%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0222%25 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0319%24 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0339%24 Aug
inferno13–110.0623%24 Aug
inferno12–120.0517%23 Aug
mirage13–30.0623%15 Aug
anubis4–20.0825%15 Aug
inferno13–110.0632%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0115%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0630%14 Aug
train12–12-0.0216%13 Aug
train7–130.0426%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0016%12 Aug
train12–12-0.0212%12 Aug
train13–90.0419%12 Aug
nuke10–130.0131%10 Aug
mirage10–10.1325%10 Aug
anubis8–130.0112%9 Aug
dust213–70.0521%9 Aug
train13–3-0.0124%9 Aug
mirage12–120.0318%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.015%8 Aug
inferno9–130.0010%8 Aug
vertigo13–70.1616%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0023%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0419%5 Aug
shelter12–120.0424%4 Aug
vertigo6–2-0.0131%4 Aug
inferno13–40.1024%3 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0220%2 Aug
dust213–20.0639%2 Aug
dust213–1-0.0019%1 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0524%1 Aug
inferno9–130.0822%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0723%31 Jul
vertigo13–20.2037%30 Jul
vertigo13–60.0610%30 Jul
vertigo6–130.0329%30 Jul
cache9–130.0725%30 Jul
vertigo12–120.1132%29 Jul
vertigo13–70.1216%29 Jul
inferno13–40.0132%28 Jul
dust213–40.0629%28 Jul
cache13–20.0634%28 Jul
dust210–130.0819%27 Jul
dust213–10.0827%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0117%24 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0430%23 Jul
anubis9–13-0.039%23 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0221%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0125%18 Jul
cache13–50.0818%18 Jul
nuke13–90.0637%17 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0124%16 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0226%16 Jul
dust213–9-0.0213%16 Jul
cache12–12-0.0232%15 Jul
inferno8–130.0322%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0418%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.1016%12 Jul
dust213–6-0.0514%12 Jul
dust213–90.0126%12 Jul
dust212–12-0.0018%12 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0316%11 Jul
cache9–13-0.0219%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0122%11 Jul
dust213–6-0.0213%11 Jul
cache13–70.0517%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0821%11 Jul
nuke8–130.0115%11 Jul
inferno13–80.1832%11 Jul
dust210–130.0215%10 Jul
mirage13–60.0323%10 Jul
cache13–7-0.0225%10 Jul
dust213–6-0.0238%10 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0018%9 Jul
dust213–00.0524%9 Jul
inferno13–60.0522%9 Jul
mirage13–40.0121%9 Jul
office13–100.0833%9 Jul
office13–80.0132%9 Jul
office12–120.1429%8 Jul
mirage2–130.0313%7 Jul
nuke13–50.1424%7 Jul
mirage13–90.1232%5 Jul
nuke9–30.1713%5 Jul
cache6–130.0313%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →