Fried Ah Dawg — CS2 Stats

76561198993041089[U:1:1032775361]✓ No bans

898Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,223Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,643Pink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3949 of 10871 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,069 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFried Ah DawgFACEITLevel 4 · 1,069 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,643 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning49
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48439Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression6.0
Utility4.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch7.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time540ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–4
130Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2261627%-0.00
mirageA1811761%-0.01
infernoA1710759%0.00
cacheB157847%-0.01
ancientA117464%0.01
anubisC73443%0.01
nukeD62433%-0.03
overpass42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,389Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
1,895Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
44.9%Headshot %
8.2%Shot accuracy
4,966MVPs
584Hours (in match)
1,320Bombs planted
403Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,842dust2
1,705inferno
1,681nuke
1,013vertigo
629lake
509train
171cbble
48ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
65%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
88.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1164%1.3616.2
Ancient367%0.659.7
Nuke333%1.1116.7
Dust22100%1.2522.0
Overpass1100%1.5323.0
Train1100%1.0715.0
Anubis10%0.7613.0
Inferno1100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
540msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.06HE damage / grenade
8.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8444% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–130.0322%27 Aug
ancient13–100.0414%26 Aug
inferno16–140.0314%26 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1211%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0225%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0626%24 Aug
inferno13–100.0817%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0517%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.0321%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0413%23 Aug
ancient13–160.0316%22 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0723%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.0213%21 Aug
cache11–13-0.0213%20 Aug
dust213–100.0315%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0018%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0816%18 Aug
anubis15–150.009%17 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0223%17 Aug
mirage13–70.0319%16 Aug
cache14–16-0.0520%16 Aug
ancient13–4-0.015%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0726%16 Aug
cache13–9-0.0117%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0210%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0813%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0119%15 Aug
mirage4–13-0.103%14 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0316%11 Aug
dust215–150.0220%10 Aug
inferno13–90.0318%10 Aug
cache13–9-0.0114%10 Aug
anubis12–16-0.008%9 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0210%8 Aug
mirage13–60.075%7 Aug
dust29–130.017%5 Aug
dust213–16-0.0210%5 Aug
inferno13–7-0.059%4 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0713%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0110%2 Aug
dust213–50.0111%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.048%26 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0510%20 Jul
cache13–60.019%19 Jul
ancient13–90.0418%19 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0210%19 Jul
anubis13–30.0423%19 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0118%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0210%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.0116%19 Jul
dust213–110.0222%19 Jul
cache15–150.0212%19 Jul
mirage13–80.1229%18 Jul
ancient5–13-0.058%18 Jul
cache13–16-0.0711%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0727%17 Jul
cache13–8-0.0223%17 Jul
mirage16–120.0312%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0124%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0022%16 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0217%16 Jul
dust215–15-0.0418%16 Jul
anubis13–90.1022%16 Jul
dust210–130.0432%16 Jul
ancient13–00.110%16 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0216%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0418%16 Jul
dust21–13-0.0719%14 Jul
dust28–130.0032%13 Jul
dust27–130.0217%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0318%12 Jul
nuke16–140.076%12 Jul
mirage4–130.0330%12 Jul
ancient7–130.0520%12 Jul
cache13–110.0117%10 Jul
inferno7–13-0.1113%10 Jul
ancient13–8-0.029%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0811%9 Jul
cache13–40.1324%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0416%7 Jul
cache12–12-0.0111%6 Jul
cache12–12-0.0413%4 Jul
nuke10–13-0.028%3 Jul
inferno13–50.0429%3 Jul
mirage8–130.0516%3 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0324%2 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0514%2 Jul
inferno13–80.0317%1 Jul
overpass5–130.0333%1 Jul
mirage13–70.0119%1 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0215%1 Jul
dust23–80.0922%30 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0311%30 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0616%30 Jun
dust213–20.0311%30 Jun
dust23–13-0.0026%29 Jun
overpass13–2-0.0226%29 Jun
overpass13–60.0716%29 Jun
dust29–13-0.0018%28 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0720%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →