oh gravy

oh gravy — CS2 Stats

US76561198984713868[U:1:1024448140]Steam profile ↗

228Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,376Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.9 Learning
Premier CS Rating5,240Light Blue band · top ~77.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26849 of 35029 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate37.6%40.1%41.7%4.0% short
Shot accuracy2.9%7.6%8.8%5.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.830.920.970.13 short
Match win rate38.0%42.2%43.8%5.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoh gravyPREMIER5,240 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning37
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42544Last 10042%Win rateLLLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1
Aggression4.0
Utility3.2
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 697ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning3.7
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time711ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 711ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — office 13–2
132Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6officeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27101737%-0.01
dust2B179853%-0.02
officeD134931%-0.00
nukeC135838%-0.04
ancientC83538%-0.04
cacheS64267%-0.03
anubisB63350%-0.03
infernoC52340%-0.02
vertigo31233%0.00
train21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

11,304Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
899Matches
38.0%Match win rate
37.6%Headshot %
2.9%Shot accuracy
963MVPs
325Hours (in match)
373Bombs planted
104Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,087dust2
695office
551inferno
512nuke
130train
117vertigo
18italy
8cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
697msReaction time
12.3%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
5.96HE damage / grenade
6.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4753 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.2606% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office8–13-0.0229%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0120%14 Aug
train8–13-0.0437%13 Aug
dust213–2-0.039%13 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0121%13 Aug
train13–10-0.0013%12 Aug
office6–130.0519%10 Aug
office1–130.0514%9 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0426%9 Aug
inferno0–13-0.056%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0114%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0520%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0218%6 Aug
mirage0–7-0.068%6 Aug
ancient13–90.0914%5 Aug
dust213–60.0713%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1115%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0024%4 Aug
dust216–13-0.0226%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0320%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0229%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0720%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0111%3 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0519%3 Aug
inferno13–30.0416%3 Aug
ancient11–130.018%3 Aug
cache6–13-0.0818%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0111%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0215%2 Aug
cache13–5-0.0822%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.1016%2 Aug
dust214–16-0.0124%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0615%2 Aug
dust213–60.0314%2 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0519%2 Aug
dust20–13-0.090%2 Aug
ancient1–13-0.060%2 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0621%1 Aug
office5–13-0.0223%1 Aug
office13–7-0.070%1 Aug
office5–13-0.0229%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.0030%31 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0118%31 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.039%31 Jul
dust25–13-0.0218%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0320%30 Jul
mirage8–10.0716%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0011%29 Jul
anubis7–130.0014%29 Jul
anubis13–60.0024%29 Jul
ancient3–13-0.145%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0915%27 Jul
dust213–4-0.024%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0322%27 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0410%25 Jul
mirage13–10-0.043%25 Jul
nuke4–13-0.089%23 Jul
office11–13-0.0317%23 Jul
office13–20.1410%23 Jul
anubis13–100.0115%22 Jul
anubis0–9-0.100%22 Jul
nuke6–13-0.056%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.110%21 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0324%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.0315%21 Jul
nuke13–9-0.028%21 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0824%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.0516%20 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0619%20 Jul
dust24–0-0.060%20 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0819%20 Jul
mirage13–70.0021%20 Jul
office13–50.0413%20 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0617%20 Jul
office2–12-0.080%19 Jul
nuke13–5-0.020%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0618%19 Jul
mirage13–30.0619%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0227%18 Jul
office12–12-0.0718%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0224%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0015%18 Jul
dust22–13-0.0817%18 Jul
mirage9–130.0214%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.059%17 Jul
nuke4–13-0.078%17 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0411%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0315%17 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0421%17 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0311%16 Jul
office13–9-0.0318%16 Jul
dust25–130.058%15 Jul
dust213–90.0314%15 Jul
office11–130.0517%14 Jul
mirage15–15-0.030%14 Jul
cache13–70.0110%14 Jul
nuke13–30.0760%13 Jul
cache7–130.0320%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0418%12 Jul
vertigo13–100.0410%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →