Jone

Jone — CS2 Stats

FI76561198976953439[U:1:1016687711]Steam profile ↗

3,349Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,450Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating25,630Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3533 of 35922 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,007), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate41.9%52.0%
Shot accuracy12.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.891.08
Match win rate46.7%48.8%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoneFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,630 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning36
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD58402Last 10058%Win rateLWLLLTLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim4.5
Aggression5.0
Utility7.0
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning3.6
Utility7.0
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time611ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–4
130Biggest win — ancient
9Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 19dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS1915479%0.00
infernoC1881044%-0.01
ancientA169756%-0.02
mirageA138562%-0.03
dust2C125742%-0.00
anubisA117464%-0.01
nukeA106460%0.01
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,480Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
5,157Matches
46.7%Match win rate
41.9%Headshot %
12.8%Shot accuracy
12,181MVPs
2,450Hours (in match)
6,618Bombs planted
1,063Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,709
MP96,845
MAC-106,251
SG 5532,349
AWP1,948
FAMAS1,557

Lifetime map wins

14,518inferno
7,040dust2
3,551nuke
2,107train
742vertigo
76cbble
6lake
1italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
64.5%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
614msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.96HE damage / grenade
11.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2039% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage1–13-0.0210%26 Jul
nuke13–50.0013%26 Jul
cache1–13-0.0611%26 Jul
nuke0–13-0.0610%26 Jul
cache8–13-0.0217%23 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0413%23 Jul
ancient1–13-0.100%23 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0717%23 Jul
anubis5–130.039%23 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0735%23 Jul
cache13–9-0.0711%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0417%23 Jul
nuke0–13-0.0520%19 Jul
cache13–40.0316%19 Jul
cache13–10.0721%19 Jul
dust213–10.0022%16 Jul
inferno4–130.0536%16 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0134%15 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0913%15 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0417%15 Jul
inferno2–4-0.090%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0318%15 Jul
ancient13–00.0033%15 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0218%15 Jul
dust213–6-0.0019%15 Jul
mirage6–2-0.0610%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0219%14 Jul
nuke13–80.1216%14 Jul
inferno2–11-0.0220%14 Jul
ancient13–00.1042%14 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0315%14 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0311%14 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0520%14 Jul
inferno13–10.025%14 Jul
cache13–2-0.0517%13 Jul
cache13–1-0.0321%13 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0333%13 Jul
cache13–60.0423%13 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0318%13 Jul
cache15–15-0.0611%13 Jul
cache3–4-0.060%13 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0515%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0317%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0313%11 Jul
ancient1–13-0.025%11 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0311%11 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0410%11 Jul
dust211–130.0217%11 Jul
anubis16–14-0.058%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0218%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0112%10 Jul
inferno4–130.0022%10 Jul
anubis13–8-0.029%10 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0116%10 Jul
cache13–110.0216%10 Jul
cache13–5-0.0825%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0314%10 Jul
cache13–110.019%10 Jul
cache13–4-0.0023%10 Jul
ancient0–11-0.116%10 Jul
anubis13–11-0.039%10 Jul
ancient13–30.0423%10 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0321%9 Jul
nuke13–40.1619%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0113%9 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0116%9 Jul
cache13–40.0026%9 Jul
cache13–50.1315%9 Jul
dust213–80.0919%9 Jul
anubis11–130.0419%9 Jul
nuke13–70.029%9 Jul
mirage3–9-0.0421%9 Jul
cache13–00.1531%6 Jul
cache13–7-0.0317%6 Jul
cache13–30.0518%6 Jul
mirage13–2-0.064%29 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0813%25 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0212%25 Jun
inferno8–13-0.067%25 Jun
inferno7–13-0.069%24 Jun
dust210–13-0.0722%24 Jun
dust216–14-0.0116%24 Jun
mirage13–80.0326%24 Jun
inferno13–100.0411%24 Jun
dust21–13-0.0420%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0315%22 Jun
anubis13–100.0216%22 Jun
mirage13–5-0.107%22 Jun
inferno13–5-0.009%22 Jun
dust28–130.0211%21 Jun
ancient13–50.0013%21 Jun
dust213–90.0412%21 Jun
anubis13–30.039%21 Jun
inferno13–30.069%21 Jun
dust210–13-0.0220%19 Jun
anubis0–6-0.0123%19 Jun
inferno9–130.0011%19 Jun
mirage3–13-0.079%19 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0314%19 Jun
ancient16–14-0.057%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →