sav ♡ — CS2 Stats
US76561198967866959[U:1:1007601231]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 3 median | Level 4 median | vs Level 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.4% | 42.1% | 42.5% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 6.1% | 12.1% | 10.9% | 4.8% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.64 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.35 short |
| Match win rate | 36.3% | 43.9% | 44.2% | 7.8% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 65% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 32% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 2.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 7 | 71% | 0.88 | 11.4 |
| Ancient | 5 | 20% | 0.65 | 11.2 |
| Italy | 4 | 0% | 0.64 | 10.0 |
| Anubis | 4 | 100% | 0.96 | 13.5 |
| Nuke | 4 | 0% | 0.63 | 10.5 |
| Dust2 | 3 | 33% | 0.66 | 11.7 |
| Overpass | 3 | 0% | 0.58 | 11.3 |
| Cache | 3 | 100% | 0.54 | 6.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4956 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 16.1741% — below the 40% mark we flag