Linus på linjen

Linus på linjen — CS2 Stats

HM76561198958676135[U:1:998410407]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

993Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
734Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,345Blue band · top ~53.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41747 of 58701 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,669), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate46.9%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy11.9%10.8%11.8%meets
Kill/death ratio0.961.001.020.07 short
Match win rate44.9%44.1%45.0%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLinus på linjenFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,345 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning43
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48466Last 10048%Win rateTLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression7.0
Utility5.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time627ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30141647%0.00
ancientC1881044%-0.01
nukeA159660%0.00
infernoD112918%-0.01
anubisA116555%-0.04
cacheA116555%0.00
dust232167%0.03
overpass110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,102Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
1,701Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,785MVPs
734Hours (in match)
1,005Bombs planted
439Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,638inferno
1,476nuke
1,276dust2
858vertigo
467train
45office
25cbble
21lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches
51%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
75.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno520%0.578.6
Mirage475%1.2014.5
Anubis1100%1.0019.0
Nuke1100%0.8315.0
Dust210%0.7613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
622msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
8.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4197 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.809% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.069%28 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0912%26 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0733%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0817%24 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0113%24 Aug
cache13–60.0121%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.068%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0725%18 Aug
mirage9–130.0127%18 Aug
mirage16–120.0223%13 Aug
anubis13–20.034%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0113%12 Aug
cache15–150.0026%11 Aug
nuke13–60.0839%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0226%9 Aug
cache2–13-0.0115%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0515%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0833%27 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0115%27 Jul
dust213–10.1418%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.037%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0213%26 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0215%26 Jul
cache13–10-0.0426%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0321%26 Jul
ancient6–2-0.120%26 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0514%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0217%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0116%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1212%26 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0220%25 Jul
ancient13–90.0526%25 Jul
mirage15–150.0322%24 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0520%24 Jul
ancient13–50.0821%24 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0323%24 Jul
nuke6–13-0.1120%24 Jul
inferno9–130.0212%24 Jul
cache13–11-0.0313%24 Jul
mirage13–70.2123%23 Jul
inferno13–10.1347%23 Jul
cache8–130.0323%23 Jul
cache16–130.1328%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0711%22 Jul
nuke13–30.0117%22 Jul
ancient13–90.1221%22 Jul
nuke13–90.1025%22 Jul
inferno10–130.0326%22 Jul
mirage13–50.1815%22 Jul
nuke8–130.0819%22 Jul
ancient9–130.0723%22 Jul
inferno13–10.0610%21 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0321%21 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0511%21 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0015%20 Jul
cache16–13-0.0042%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0616%20 Jul
mirage13–70.0110%20 Jul
inferno14–16-0.014%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.037%19 Jul
mirage4–13-0.055%19 Jul
anubis8–1-0.0032%19 Jul
nuke10–130.0012%19 Jul
cache13–40.0214%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.054%18 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0921%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.046%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0217%18 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0411%18 Jul
cache8–13-0.0213%18 Jul
nuke10–130.1219%16 Jul
mirage4–130.0431%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0113%15 Jul
mirage16–130.0516%15 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0513%7 Jul
cache4–13-0.0417%7 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0210%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0226%1 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0713%11 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0430%21 May
mirage16–130.0239%20 May
ancient13–60.0326%19 May
ancient7–13-0.038%7 May
mirage11–13-0.016%6 May
mirage13–2-0.017%4 May
mirage11–13-0.0510%3 May
nuke13–8-0.1129%3 May
mirage10–13-0.0516%3 May
dust216–13-0.0120%3 May
nuke13–5-0.0210%1 May
mirage13–3-0.0111%1 May
mirage13–90.0523%1 May
ancient13–10-0.016%1 May
anubis13–11-0.0212%1 May
ancient16–140.018%1 May
overpass13–10-0.0312%29 Apr
mirage7–130.0116%28 Apr
nuke13–20.029%25 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0524%23 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0023%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →