ManSpider

ManSpider — CS2 Stats

US76561198950014671[U:1:989748943]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

378Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
272Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGManSpiderFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning46
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression2.9
Utility4.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time593ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–0
130Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1991047%-0.01
nukeA1810856%0.00
ancientD1651131%0.00
dust2A159660%-0.01
mirageD113827%-0.03
overpassA95456%-0.01
anubisS75271%-0.02
train31233%-0.00
cache110100%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,063Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
820Matches
42.9%Match win rate
43.8%Headshot %
5.6%Shot accuracy
1,593MVPs
272Hours (in match)
776Bombs planted
207Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,127nuke
1,073inferno
611dust2
444train
380vertigo
245office
53italy
44assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
65%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
77.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke6100%1.3015.3
Anubis683%1.0616.0
Ancient450%1.0415.3
Dust210%0.5910.0
Overpass1100%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
594msReaction time
18.8%T opening success
34.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.42HE damage / grenade
4.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.7637% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0514%28 Aug
dust216–14-0.0520%27 Aug
dust213–5-0.0016%16 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0817%16 Aug
dust21–13-0.0917%9 Aug
cache16–12-0.0529%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0637%9 Aug
ancient9–130.0024%9 Aug
anubis13–60.0214%9 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0320%12 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0124%3 Jul
dust213–90.007%3 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0221%28 Jun
nuke13–00.1317%21 Jun
nuke13–80.0017%21 Jun
nuke13–40.0026%21 Jun
anubis13–70.0523%20 Jun
dust27–13-0.0422%20 Jun
dust211–130.0214%20 Jun
inferno6–13-0.110%20 Jun
ancient13–70.0818%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0429%20 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0716%13 Jun
ancient13–10-0.049%13 Jun
overpass13–100.0227%30 May
dust213–3-0.0413%30 May
inferno9–7-0.0023%28 May
vertigo6–9-0.1717%28 May
nuke13–50.0324%26 May
anubis13–4-0.075%25 May
dust213–100.0116%25 May
ancient10–130.0124%25 May
dust26–13-0.108%23 May
nuke9–13-0.0914%23 May
overpass13–6-0.0213%23 May
nuke11–13-0.0423%23 May
dust213–90.0131%23 May
ancient13–70.0330%23 May
nuke13–110.0412%17 May
overpass13–5-0.0324%17 May
ancient10–130.0411%17 May
inferno11–130.0228%4 May
overpass13–160.0120%3 May
ancient13–11-0.0017%3 May
nuke13–110.1221%3 May
nuke14–16-0.0013%2 May
nuke13–50.0721%2 May
overpass13–20.0315%2 May
inferno13–40.0522%2 May
inferno11–13-0.0120%27 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0212%26 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0411%26 Apr
ancient13–6-0.025%25 Apr
nuke13–7-0.019%25 Apr
mirage13–50.0636%19 Apr
anubis14–16-0.059%19 Apr
ancient7–130.0323%18 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0213%18 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0312%5 Apr
mirage8–13-0.059%5 Apr
inferno13–90.0116%5 Apr
dust213–110.0421%30 Mar
nuke8–130.0019%29 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0419%29 Mar
anubis16–14-0.0415%29 Mar
ancient9–130.0217%29 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0510%29 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0523%29 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0228%29 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0420%28 Mar
inferno13–80.0416%15 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0612%15 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0012%15 Mar
inferno9–130.0021%15 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0221%15 Mar
inferno13–90.0614%1 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0216%25 Jan
dust210–130.0121%20 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0117%19 Jan
dust213–9-0.0223%19 Jan
dust29–13-0.0111%19 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0721%18 Jan
inferno6–130.0020%17 Jan
inferno16–12-0.0224%17 Jan
inferno13–110.0323%11 Jan
dust213–40.0733%11 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0113%10 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0126%10 Jan
ancient15–150.0230%10 Jan
mirage0–8-0.058%10 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0217%4 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0129%4 Jan
mirage13–16-0.0820%4 Jan
mirage12–160.0317%3 Jan
inferno7–20.0131%3 Jan
ancient15–150.0322%3 Jan
train9–130.0215%3 Jan
train6–13-0.0222%3 Jan
nuke13–70.0312%3 Jan
train13–100.0024%28 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →