Luke_is_I — CS2 Stats

76561198930708811[U:1:970443083]✓ No bans

751Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
833Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,374Blue band · top ~47.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12225 of 17009 tracked
FaceitLevel 2 · 466 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLuke_is_IFACEITLevel 2 · 466 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER11,374 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning44
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48493Last 10048%Win rateLLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression2.9
Utility2.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.4
Utility2.1
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time669ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 694ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 9% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA23131057%-0.00
dust2C2281436%-0.01
mirageA1912763%-0.02
anubisD111109%-0.03
infernoC104640%-0.03
nukeS97278%-0.02
ancientC52340%-0.04
office110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,794Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
1,495Matches
39.0%Match win rate
42.5%Headshot %
4.9%Shot accuracy
2,127MVPs
542Hours (in match)
1,483Bombs planted
329Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,916dust2
1,639nuke
862inferno
469vertigo
344lake
163train
92office
10cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
39%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
70.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22133%0.8613.1
Mirage1947%0.7812.2
Inferno1638%0.8413.6
Anubis425%0.9912.0
Ancient450%0.569.0
Cache367%1.9810.7
Nuke333%0.8912.7
Vertigo2100%1.0813.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
90.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
676msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
9.31HE damage / grenade
0.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.5459% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.269 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.3034% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0710%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0317%24 Aug
dust211–130.0018%22 Aug
cache13–20.185%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0411%19 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0210%17 Aug
cache13–80.0315%17 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0516%17 Aug
dust26–130.049%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0721%16 Aug
dust213–20.0534%16 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0910%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.009%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.045%16 Aug
cache13–60.1718%15 Aug
nuke13–50.0614%15 Aug
dust213–20.0521%15 Aug
cache13–80.028%15 Aug
cache8–130.0018%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0712%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.036%1 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0112%1 Aug
cache16–14-0.0611%30 Jul
nuke5–13-0.053%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0312%30 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0214%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.048%30 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0911%30 Jul
cache10–13-0.0013%29 Jul
anubis6–130.0310%29 Jul
dust213–8-0.0112%28 Jul
cache8–13-0.0412%28 Jul
dust212–120.034%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0811%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0316%28 Jul
cache15–15-0.039%28 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0412%28 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0820%28 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0414%28 Jul
mirage13–100.019%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0512%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.076%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0113%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0115%25 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0418%25 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0113%25 Jul
mirage13–4-0.019%25 Jul
dust213–6-0.0111%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.098%25 Jul
cache13–100.0112%25 Jul
nuke13–110.0114%25 Jul
nuke11–130.008%25 Jul
dust213–50.0513%25 Jul
mirage5–130.0215%25 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0713%25 Jul
anubis4–13-0.075%25 Jul
dust213–4-0.0116%25 Jul
nuke13–6-0.019%25 Jul
anubis10–130.036%24 Jul
dust215–150.0115%24 Jul
cache16–12-0.0015%24 Jul
inferno7–13-0.017%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.007%24 Jul
dust24–13-0.033%23 Jul
dust210–13-0.067%23 Jul
cache13–11-0.1111%23 Jul
ancient6–13-0.089%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0114%23 Jul
office13–30.0619%23 Jul
cache8–13-0.0218%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0023%23 Jul
nuke16–12-0.058%22 Jul
dust23–130.0129%22 Jul
cache13–9-0.0410%22 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0316%22 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0413%22 Jul
cache13–8-0.015%22 Jul
cache13–11-0.0312%21 Jul
cache4–13-0.047%21 Jul
dust24–12-0.0614%21 Jul
inferno7–130.0214%21 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0110%21 Jul
mirage13–90.0214%21 Jul
mirage13–60.0521%21 Jul
cache13–60.0513%21 Jul
inferno13–110.0012%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0321%21 Jul
dust25–13-0.0121%20 Jul
cache16–14-0.0211%20 Jul
mirage13–110.018%20 Jul
inferno13–30.0011%20 Jul
cache8–130.0214%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0214%20 Jul
inferno13–5-0.074%19 Jul
cache9–13-0.079%19 Jul
nuke13–8-0.059%19 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0216%19 Jul
anubis3–13-0.016%19 Jul
dust29–13-0.0321%19 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0815%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →