๐†๐๐€๐‘๐‹๐˜

๐†๐๐€๐‘๐‹๐˜ โ€” CS2 Stats

US76561198887356202[U:1:927090474]Steam profile โ†—

3,413Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,154Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,232Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band ยท top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8615 of 24423 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 ยท 1,788 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.7%47.2%49.0%meets
Shot accuracy9.8%12.3%13.1%3.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.271.071.08above
Match win rate52.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐†๐๐€๐‘๐‹๐˜FACEITLevel 8 ยท 1,788 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,232 ยท Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning58
Utility47

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54โ€“41โ€“5Last 10054%Win rateLLTWWTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate ยท +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler โ€” Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression7.3
Utility4.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03โˆ’0.01
first โ…“ avg 0.03 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.03
Reaction time522msโˆ’41ms
first โ…“ avg 564ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%+0.1%
first โ…“ avg 23.2% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating โ€” overpass 9โ€“3
13โ€“2Biggest win โ€” mirage
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5โ€“10In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map ยท 80% over 5infernoWeakest map ยท 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1610โ€“663%0.03
anubisB157โ€“847%0.02
nukeA149โ€“564%0.02
cacheA148โ€“657%0.03
dust2A106โ€“460%0.03
infernoD62โ€“433%0.03
boulderS54โ€“180%0.00
vertigoโ€”41โ€“325%0.03
officeโ€”31โ€“233%0.06
overpassโ€”33โ€“0100%0.07
debrisโ€”20โ€“20%-0.04
ancientโ€”20โ€“20%0.00
fachwerkโ€”21โ€“150%0.02
shelterโ€”21โ€“150%0.07
trainโ€”11โ€“0100%0.08
eldoradoโ€”10โ€“10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

133,197Lifetime kills
1.27K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 8 players
7,121Matches
52.2%Match win rate ยท Top 10% of Level 8 players
49.7%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 8 players
9.8%Shot accuracy
15,732MVPs
3,064Hours (in match)
6,079Bombs planted
2,654Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,546
AWP10,570
MP93,097
Knife2,091

Lifetime map wins

10,796dust2
7,695inferno
6,972nuke
3,866vertigo
2,005train
738office
613cbble
332italy

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,596Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218046%1.1016.1
Anubis16553%1.2116.1
Mirage13137%1.1114.8
Nuke12855%1.1716.2
Ancient11848%1.1016.2
Overpass6447%1.0115.6
Inferno5657%1.1515.5
Vertigo5155%1.0015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
10.7ยฐPreaim
522msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
12.51HE damage / grenade
5.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.471 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.4233% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
boulder11โ€“130.0623%29 Aug โ†’
office8โ€“13-0.0218%29 Aug โ†’
vertigo8โ€“80.0726%29 Aug โ†’
overpass9โ€“30.2617%29 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“70.0821%28 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0231%28 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0427%27 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“110.0223%26 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“30.1433%25 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0717%25 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0123%25 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0219%24 Aug โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0221%24 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0220%23 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0428%22 Aug โ†’
train13โ€“40.0818%22 Aug โ†’
vertigo8โ€“100.0530%22 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0123%16 Aug โ†’
nuke12โ€“12-0.0916%16 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0216%16 Aug โ†’
overpass13โ€“5-0.0821%15 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0729%13 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0233%13 Aug โ†’
vertigo11โ€“13-0.0513%12 Aug โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0023%11 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0116%8 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.0429%8 Aug โ†’
mirage16โ€“130.0623%8 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0218%7 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“40.0733%7 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0828%7 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“5-0.0034%7 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“120.0818%7 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0238%7 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“16-0.0212%6 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“7-0.0216%6 Aug โ†’
nuke16โ€“120.0323%6 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“160.0319%5 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0820%4 Aug โ†’
office11โ€“130.0920%4 Aug โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0244%4 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0225%4 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0820%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.2025%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.1123%3 Aug โ†’
anubis2โ€“13-0.0419%3 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.0722%3 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0830%1 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0514%31 Jul โ†’
debris8โ€“80.0227%31 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0123%30 Jul โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0327%30 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0612%29 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0930%29 Jul โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0138%28 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0924%28 Jul โ†’
cache7โ€“130.0622%28 Jul โ†’
anubis5โ€“13-0.0326%26 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0733%26 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0322%26 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0623%25 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0934%24 Jul โ†’
debris4โ€“9-0.1123%24 Jul โ†’
eldorado5โ€“9-0.0624%24 Jul โ†’
nuke18โ€“22-0.0619%24 Jul โ†’
boulder13โ€“3-0.0216%23 Jul โ†’
boulder4โ€“0-0.0325%23 Jul โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.0412%22 Jul โ†’
dust217โ€“190.0523%22 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0130%21 Jul โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0432%20 Jul โ†’
vertigo7โ€“130.0325%16 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0222%15 Jul โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0617%15 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.1119%14 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“60.0817%14 Jul โ†’
cache9โ€“13-0.0214%13 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0329%13 Jul โ†’
cache9โ€“130.0320%11 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0114%11 Jul โ†’
ancient8โ€“130.0517%11 Jul โ†’
anubis6โ€“130.0221%11 Jul โ†’
office13โ€“90.1220%11 Jul โ†’
fachwerk5โ€“130.0529%10 Jul โ†’
boulder13โ€“90.0424%9 Jul โ†’
fachwerk13โ€“50.0018%9 Jul โ†’
shelter13โ€“50.0725%9 Jul โ†’
shelter10โ€“130.0617%9 Jul โ†’
boulder13โ€“10-0.0221%8 Jul โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0122%8 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“70.0125%6 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“7-0.0028%6 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.0132%5 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“8-0.0325%3 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.0228%3 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0524%2 Jul โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0329%2 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“50.0431%1 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.1039%1 Jul โ†’
overpass13โ€“80.0217%1 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’