pineapple

pineapple — CS2 Stats

76561198880524961[U:1:920259233]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

609Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,781Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate48.4%42.7%44.0%above
Shot accuracy24.7%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.251.001.03above
Match win rate36.8%44.1%45.1%8.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpineappleFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateTLWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression5.1
Utility3.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility3.3
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time627ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — nuke 9–1
131Biggest win — anubis
9Longest win streak
147In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC1771041%0.00
infernoB157847%0.01
ancientA127558%0.01
dust2A117464%0.03
nukeS107370%0.05
trainB105550%0.01
overpassC73443%0.01
anubisD51420%0.02
cache32167%0.03
office31233%-0.01
agency330100%0.06
grail220100%-0.02
poseidon1010%-0.07
jura110100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,155Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
4,207Matches
36.8%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
24.7%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 4 players
5,545MVPs
1,058Hours (in match)
1,499Bombs planted
456Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,938
AWP11,338
AUG1,396
FAMAS1,156

Lifetime map wins

6,664dust2
2,601nuke
1,141train
1,111inferno
470vertigo
248office
122cbble
119lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
56%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
614msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
4.34HE damage / grenade
8.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3511 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.867% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–12-0.0433%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0323%14 May
nuke9–10.2735%14 May
cache13–110.0823%9 May
cache13–70.0521%6 May
inferno9–130.0424%1 May
nuke13–10-0.0420%1 May
cache2–13-0.0429%1 May
ancient5–13-0.0733%28 Apr
overpass13–70.0340%25 Apr
inferno9–130.0212%25 Apr
train10–130.0616%25 Apr
office7–13-0.0625%24 Apr
nuke5–40.0924%24 Apr
poseidon5–9-0.0730%23 Apr
train3–13-0.0623%23 Apr
ancient4–130.0136%23 Apr
train13–7-0.0119%23 Apr
train12–120.0130%21 Apr
inferno13–90.0028%31 Mar
train10–130.0127%1 Mar
train13–9-0.0219%26 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0420%18 Feb
office13–11-0.0336%22 Jan
office8–130.0625%22 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0428%5 Dec
mirage1–13-0.0722%5 Dec
overpass5–130.0120%30 Sept
grail13–30.0129%30 Aug
grail13–4-0.0537%29 Aug
mirage14–160.0122%24 Aug
dust216–13-0.0130%23 Aug
anubis13–10.1127%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0518%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0122%20 Aug
overpass7–13-0.0518%18 Aug
dust216–120.0128%18 Aug
ancient13–20.0946%18 Aug
overpass9–130.0327%17 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0318%17 Aug
ancient13–40.0315%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0126%15 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0524%15 Aug
train13–100.1022%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0530%13 Aug
dust213–30.1046%13 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0021%12 Aug
mirage13–110.0318%10 Aug
nuke13–110.0725%9 Aug
dust213–80.0921%7 Aug
agency13–60.0525%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0929%5 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0339%5 Aug
jura13–30.2136%5 Aug
inferno8–130.0329%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0323%4 Aug
dust213–30.0529%3 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0126%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0619%3 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0218%2 Aug
train13–60.0433%2 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0932%2 Aug
ancient13–110.0218%2 Aug
inferno13–20.0813%1 Aug
train6–13-0.0019%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0134%1 Aug
nuke7–130.0831%30 Jul
dust214–16-0.0014%30 Jul
ancient7–130.0115%30 Jul
overpass16–140.0021%30 Jul
mirage15–150.0117%29 Jul
dust213–90.0716%18 Jul
overpass13–40.0821%16 Jul
dust28–130.0128%7 Jul
anubis12–120.0320%28 Jun
anubis8–130.0322%25 Jun
inferno14–160.0013%19 Jun
agency13–20.1121%15 Jun
agency13–60.0222%12 Jun
mirage14–160.0320%7 Jun
anubis1–8-0.0323%7 Jun
inferno5–40.0231%2 Jun
mirage15–150.0021%29 May
dust210–130.0033%29 May
dust28–13-0.0325%28 May
mirage13–80.0527%28 May
inferno6–13-0.0319%24 May
inferno8–13-0.0427%23 May
mirage14–160.0328%22 May
mirage6–13-0.0316%22 May
mirage13–110.1128%22 May
ancient13–9-0.0133%21 May
ancient13–40.0320%21 May
train13–110.0221%21 May
ancient11–130.0019%20 May
ancient13–110.0123%20 May
nuke13–30.0711%19 May
inferno13–30.0225%19 May
mirage13–80.0226%19 May
dust213–50.0929%19 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →