Brucee Lee — CS2 Stats

PL76561198874870843[U:1:914605115]Steam profile ↗

3,126Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since

3,004Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5901 of 46940 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,898 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	59.1%	48.5%	51.9%	above
Shot accuracy	3.9%	13.3%	13.7%	9.8% short
Kill/death ratio	1.42	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	48.2%	47.0%	48.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning58

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–48–10Last 10042%Win rateLTLLWWTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression9.8

Utility4.3

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.8

Utility4.3

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time532ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms

Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–0Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 18infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	20	11–9	55%	0.01
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	0.01
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	0.01
inferno	D	11	2–9	18%	0.00
vertigo	C	11	4–7	36%	0.04
ancient	B	10	5–5	50%	0.05
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	0.02
dust2	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
office	—	2	0–2	0%	0.06
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

185,722Lifetime kills

1.42K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players

6,010Matches

48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players

59.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players

3.9%Shot accuracy

17,403MVPs

3,004Hours (in match)

5,357Bombs planted

2,078Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47102,954

M4A4 / M4A1-S23,711

P2000 / USP-S8,818

Galil AR5,640

AWP5,592

Glock-184,909

Desert Eagle4,729

MP93,712

AUG3,165

FAMAS2,926

Lifetime map wins

8,322inferno

6,274nuke

4,562vertigo

4,494dust2

1,621train

528cbble

212lake

202office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,781Matches

51%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

78.1ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	587	52%	1.00	15.1
Ancient	261	53%	1.01	15.6
Anubis	221	50%	1.02	15.6
Nuke	194	49%	0.97	15.2
Inferno	170	50%	1.00	15.4
Vertigo	125	48%	1.05	15.8
Dust2	109	43%	0.87	14.6
Train	53	60%	1.02	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy

41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.4%Spray accuracy

82.4%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

542msReaction time

34.6%T opening success

62.6%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

11.7%Flash assists

7.38HE damage / grenade

3.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4322 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.6206% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	5–13	0.04	12%	29 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.01	32%	27 Aug →
vertigo	6–9	0.01	16%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	13%	27 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	30%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	32%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.08	4%	22 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	12%	22 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.05	13%	21 Aug →
vertigo	2–13	-0.01	27%	19 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	26%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.00	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	19%	14 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	35%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	10%	12 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.03	22%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	16%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	8%	6 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	33%	5 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.04	17%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.12	14%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.05	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	12%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	25%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	19%	2 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	33%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.09	14%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.21	15%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.08	14%	30 Jul →
inferno	1–9	-0.19	12%	29 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	22%	29 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	17%	22 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.05	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.02	25%	22 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	0.07	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	23%	19 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.03	0%	19 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.04	20%	17 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.08	24%	17 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.09	17%	17 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.00	26%	17 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	-0.09	26%	17 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.15	19%	17 Jul →
eldorado	3–9	-0.02	20%	17 Jul →
inferno	7–9	0.08	29%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	11%	13 Jul →
nuke	3–13	0.04	28%	12 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.07	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.04	27%	12 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	19%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.04	16%	11 Jul →
ancient	4–11	0.04	14%	11 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.01	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	18%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	22%	10 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	21%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	20%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.11	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	14%	9 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	22%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.05	17%	6 Jul →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	17%	5 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	16%	2 Jul →
mirage	0–4	-0.06	0%	2 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	24%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.05	11%	2 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.02	24%	2 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	8%	2 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	16%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–0	0.06	31%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.08	24%	28 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	0.08	14%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	18%	28 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.12	30%	28 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.07	14%	28 Jun →
cache	2–8	0.03	38%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.05	24%	25 Jun →
inferno	7–9	0.01	18%	25 Jun →
nuke	5–9	-0.10	14%	25 Jun →
train	8–13	0.02	12%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.09	19%	25 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.10	25%	24 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.03	22%	22 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.04	17%	22 Jun →
warden	10–13	-0.05	14%	22 Jun →
nuke	14–16	-0.05	18%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.07	23%	21 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.05	15%	21 Jun →
office	10–13	0.04	12%	21 Jun →
cache	3–13	-0.10	28%	21 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.02	11%	19 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.00	19%	18 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.02	12%	17 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.05	26%	17 Jun →
anubis	13–2	-0.01	18%	16 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.08	30%	15 Jun →
office	2–13	0.09	35%	15 Jun →
alpine	12–12	0.06	11%	15 Jun →