jonh thanos — CS2 Stats

76561198872445580[U:1:912179852]✓ No bans

99Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
158Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,091Purple band · top ~20.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9796 of 16929 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjonh thanosFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,091 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning47
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49368Last 9353%Win rateWLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression4.8
Utility1.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.3

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.7
Utility1.8
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time713ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 744ms → last ⅓ avg 713ms
Headshot accuracy33.1%+7.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 33.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 93 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–7
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21101148%-0.00
nukeA2113862%0.00
dust2A1710759%-0.02
cacheS96367%-0.01
vertigoA95456%-0.01
infernoD82625%-0.01
ancient41325%-0.01
anubis42250%0.01

Across the last 93 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

5,093Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
208Matches
45.2%Match win rate
67.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
477MVPs
138Hours (in match)
15Bombs planted
24Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

672nuke
221dust2
120vertigo
98inferno
12cbble
12train
3office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
33%Win rate
0.65Avg K/D
ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.2%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
711msReaction time
31.7%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
0.62HE damage / grenade
4.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.7457ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7178% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–14-0.1152%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0728%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1117%23 Aug
cache14–16-0.0233%23 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0516%20 Aug
inferno12–160.0021%20 Aug
dust211–130.0128%20 Aug
cache13–10.0743%18 Aug
mirage13–50.0640%18 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0134%17 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0437%17 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0147%17 Aug
dust213–70.0135%17 Aug
dust213–11-0.0238%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0233%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0039%6 Aug
dust213–60.0130%6 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0426%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0132%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0136%6 Aug
cache13–10-0.0531%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0129%5 Aug
dust213–5-0.0222%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0548%5 Aug
dust213–110.0021%5 Aug
dust213–90.0342%5 Aug
nuke16–120.0431%5 Aug
inferno9–130.0026%5 Aug
nuke13–40.0130%5 Aug
mirage13–70.1343%5 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0041%5 Aug
cache0–6-0.0460%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0130%4 Aug
cache13–4-0.0726%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0029%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0741%28 Jul
ancient9–130.0336%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0929%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0429%27 Jul
inferno13–20.0220%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0329%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0239%27 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0330%27 Jul
dust24–0-0.0133%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.0317%27 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0521%27 Jul
mirage12–120.0129%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0133%27 Jul
anubis13–30.1143%27 Jul
mirage11–60.0139%9 Jun
dust213–7-0.0133%9 Jun
nuke12–120.0122%6 Jun
anubis13–2-0.0132%6 Jun
dust213–4-0.0129%6 Jun
mirage13–20.0626%6 Jun
cache9–13-0.0328%6 Jun
ancient13–50.0641%28 Sept
mirage13–50.0640%28 Sept
vertigo13–50.0843%13 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0141%5 Sept
inferno7–90.0226%2 Sept
cache9–70.1038%4 Aug
nuke9–40.1018%4 Aug
nuke5–90.0232%31 Jul
nuke9–10.0630%30 Jul
nuke8–80.0026%30 Jul
mirage8–80.0245%30 Jul
nuke9–1-0.1050%30 Jul
mirage4–9-0.1124%27 Jul
inferno4–10-0.0813%4 Jul
mirage6–90.0235%3 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0228%3 Jul
vertigo16–19-0.0726%24 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0430%24 Jun
vertigo9–70.0350%21 Mar
vertigo8–8-0.0816%21 Mar
vertigo15–15-0.0529%7 Jan
nuke12–160.0030%24 Sept
vertigo16–80.0021%26 May
cache16–50.0018%11 May
vertigo16–80.0021%11 May
mirage12–160.0021%24 Apr
nuke8–00.0031%24 Apr
mirage4–50.0020%16 Apr
nuke2–100.0036%13 Apr
nuke16–130.0012%26 Mar
nuke4–160.0018%26 Mar
vertigo16–130.0030%18 Mar
vertigo10–160.0023%14 Mar
inferno12–160.009%18 Feb
nuke3–80.0018%28 Dec
nuke16–110.0017%26 Dec
nuke16–80.0029%29 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →