t — CS2 Stats

76561199135028382[U:1:1174762654]

255Tracked matches52%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,163Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning64

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–39–9Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression7.3

Utility5.8

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning6.4

Utility5.8

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time636ms+10ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy33.3%+7.3%

first ⅓ avg 26.0% → last ⅓ avg 33.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — train 13–2

13–1Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	25	16–9	64%	0.03
dust2	B	24	13–11	54%	0.00
mirage	C	24	10–14	42%	0.00
anubis	D	9	2–7	22%	0.01
ancient	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.03
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.11
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.07
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

34.0%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.2%Spray accuracy

91.6%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

637msReaction time

37.4%T opening success

51.2%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

9.0%Flash assists

9.82HE damage / grenade

14.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.4015% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	-0.01	43%	26 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.01	36%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	29%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	25%	23 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	30%	23 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.08	31%	23 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.02	32%	22 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	29%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	35%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	33%	20 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.03	43%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.07	39%	19 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.11	40%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	32%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	28%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	19%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	48%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	41%	17 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	27%	16 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	38%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	47%	15 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.11	43%	15 Aug →
train	13–2	0.22	44%	14 Aug →
train	12–12	0.01	44%	14 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	19%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.00	52%	6 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	28%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	29%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	24%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	21%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	43%	5 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	28%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	22%	5 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	29%	3 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	31%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	36%	3 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	17%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	31%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	30%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	25%	30 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	33%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	33%	30 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.00	22%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.09	33%	28 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.00	33%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.03	48%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.11	45%	27 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.03	32%	27 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.11	41%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.00	30%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	27%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	33%	26 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.03	43%	25 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.09	35%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	31%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	29%	25 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.05	31%	25 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	22%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.03	30%	25 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.08	38%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.12	60%	22 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	15%	15 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	24%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	57%	13 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	24%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	23%	13 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	31%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	25%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.00	44%	13 Jul →
mirage	0–4	-0.06	0%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.06	17%	12 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	43%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	20%	12 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.06	31%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.11	26%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.02	23%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.01	27%	11 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.06	17%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	27%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.05	21%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	33%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	23%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	14%	9 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.01	13%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	37%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.08	17%	9 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	14%	9 Jul →
office	13–6	0.10	34%	8 Jul →
office	6–13	0.05	21%	8 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.05	25%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.03	43%	6 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.04	28%	6 Jul →