Ringwald — CS2 Stats

76561198868611698[U:1:908345970]✓ No bans

1,555Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,541Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRingwaldFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning36
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38566Last 10038%Win rateWWLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression2.0
Utility5.5
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning3.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time631ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–3
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD2051525%-0.02
infernoC167944%-0.01
mirageD1631319%-0.03
nukeC125742%-0.01
anubisS118373%-0.02
ancientD93633%0.01
dust2A74357%-0.03
train3030%-0.03
overpass21150%0.01
warden21150%-0.05
office1010%-0.08
stronghold110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,714Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
5,276Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
38.9%Headshot %
5.0%Shot accuracy
6,021MVPs
1,524Hours (in match)
3,064Bombs planted
512Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,956inferno
4,587nuke
2,950vertigo
2,050dust2
1,661train
257office
219italy
179cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

114Matches
48%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2335%0.7712.2
Inferno2162%1.0815.1
Cache1753%0.9214.1
Nuke1560%1.1916.9
Ancient1436%1.1415.6
Dust21258%1.0013.3
Anubis1030%0.9813.6
Overpass10%0.5310.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
634msReaction time
18.9%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
7.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6442% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.8634% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–30.069%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0111%28 Aug
cache2–13-0.078%28 Aug
cache13–50.0115%28 Aug
anubis13–10-0.009%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0211%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0412%26 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0318%24 Aug
cache16–14-0.0218%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0021%22 Aug
cache9–13-0.0314%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0510%17 Aug
anubis5–13-0.076%17 Aug
ancient3–130.0011%16 Aug
inferno13–4-0.028%15 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0319%11 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0233%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0114%9 Aug
ancient16–140.0216%7 Aug
anubis13–50.0716%6 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0715%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0515%4 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0516%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0111%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0011%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0218%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0216%30 Jul
dust25–13-0.0215%29 Jul
inferno13–30.1019%29 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0624%28 Jul
cache13–100.0119%27 Jul
cache11–13-0.0414%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0324%27 Jul
nuke13–10.0627%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.0224%23 Jul
cache6–13-0.0319%20 Jul
ancient11–130.0316%20 Jul
dust213–4-0.0317%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0412%17 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0413%17 Jul
ancient8–130.0310%16 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0115%14 Jul
ancient13–11-0.057%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0822%10 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0120%6 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0717%6 Jul
ancient15–150.0414%6 Jul
nuke13–30.1124%6 Jul
cache8–130.0321%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0232%2 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0615%1 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0620%30 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0011%30 Jun
mirage13–40.0425%27 Jun
mirage10–130.0014%27 Jun
nuke7–130.014%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.018%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0321%23 Jun
anubis13–70.0215%23 Jun
train10–13-0.0419%14 Jun
office2–13-0.0811%25 May
nuke0–13-0.0616%25 May
anubis13–90.0616%25 May
warden13–8-0.0211%18 May
train11–13-0.0010%15 May
cache3–13-0.0810%15 May
cache12–12-0.078%3 May
cache11–13-0.066%3 May
cache12–12-0.0321%1 May
cache13–70.0319%1 May
cache5–13-0.0220%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0115%29 Apr
nuke13–10-0.048%25 Apr
anubis13–11-0.1218%25 Apr
nuke9–13-0.026%22 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0429%21 Apr
train8–13-0.0516%21 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0214%18 Apr
mirage12–12-0.017%18 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0521%6 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0220%4 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0515%2 Mar
mirage3–13-0.1012%2 Mar
overpass13–30.0215%28 Feb
inferno15–150.0115%25 Feb
stronghold13–1-0.029%23 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0422%23 Feb
inferno5–130.0021%23 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0714%22 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0510%22 Feb
dust28–13-0.0919%21 Feb
warden12–12-0.0821%21 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0012%15 Feb
mirage13–90.0420%15 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0115%8 Feb
ancient9–130.0417%8 Feb
dust213–8-0.0112%8 Feb
dust213–8-0.0011%8 Feb
dust213–80.0315%8 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0122%6 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →