Jimothy — CS2 Stats

76561198853632273[U:1:893366545]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

463Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,725Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating14,525Blue band · top ~30.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7943 of 11947 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning39

Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–32–13Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3

Aggression2.6

Utility2.5

Positioning3.9

Opening Duels0.2

Clutch1.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning3.9

Utility2.5

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time573ms−77ms

first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms

Headshot accuracy23.9%−5.9%

first ⅓ avg 29.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — vertigo 6–0

13–1Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	47	27–20	57%	0.00
mirage	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
vertigo	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	0.02
ancient	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
dust2	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
office	—	4	2–2	50%	0.05
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	0.09
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,725Lifetime kills

0.93K/D

1,524Matches

44.2%Match win rate

41.7%Headshot %

10.6%Shot accuracy

5,318MVPs

571Hours (in match)

1,421Bombs planted

301Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP5,568

AK-474,941

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,425

Desert Eagle2,199

P2000 / USP-S1,282

Glock-181,073

Knife823

SSG 08736

MP9491

XM1014489

Lifetime map wins

3,028nuke

1,158inferno

777vertigo

734dust2

491office

441cbble

248train

207lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

201Matches

52%Win rate

0.80Avg K/D

66.0ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	42	62%	0.79	11.7
Anubis	34	74%	0.90	14.0
Ancient	25	52%	0.72	12.3
Overpass	23	39%	0.79	11.9
Mirage	20	35%	0.76	13.1
Inferno	11	45%	0.64	9.7
Dust2	9	44%	0.80	12.0
Vertigo	9	67%	1.06	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy

34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.9%Spray accuracy

72.4%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

574msReaction time

22.4%T opening success

39.0%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

7.80HE damage / grenade

2.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3726 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.422% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
overpass	4–13	-0.02	12%	26 Jul →
nuke	9–7	-0.08	27%	26 Jul →
nuke	6–11	0.03	13%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	23%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.05	18%	16 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	5%	16 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	26%	15 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.13	21%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.02	18%	14 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.08	22%	6 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.01	13%	16 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	9%	12 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.11	20%	12 May →
nuke	13–7	0.04	25%	12 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	24%	11 May →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	12%	11 May →
nuke	13–10	0.05	32%	11 May →
ancient	13–5	-0.05	33%	4 May →
mirage	6–13	0.06	5%	28 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.03	28%	28 Apr →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	32%	25 Apr →
office	1–6	-0.06	17%	25 Apr →
office	12–12	0.03	29%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	31%	21 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.05	67%	21 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	4%	20 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.01	30%	20 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	27%	19 Apr →
vertigo	9–7	0.05	22%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.06	30%	16 Apr →
mirage	4–13	0.03	57%	13 Apr →
mirage	15–15	0.00	20%	9 Apr →
vertigo	6–0	0.25	38%	9 Apr →
mirage	15–15	0.02	23%	8 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.07	16%	5 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.03	33%	5 Apr →
ancient	15–15	0.00	13%	3 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.05	30%	3 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	24%	3 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	15%	31 Mar →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	0%	29 Mar →
nuke	3–9	-0.12	18%	26 Mar →
nuke	9–5	0.19	52%	26 Mar →
anubis	13–3	0.08	20%	26 Mar →
nuke	13–4	-0.06	13%	24 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.04	13%	24 Mar →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	20%	24 Mar →
train	4–13	0.02	24%	23 Mar →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	11%	23 Mar →
vertigo	9–6	0.10	43%	22 Mar →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	30%	19 Mar →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	8%	15 Mar →
warden	10–13	0.03	24%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.05	19%	6 Mar →
nuke	16–14	0.05	26%	25 Feb →
nuke	13–2	0.07	23%	21 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	29%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	19%	18 Feb →
overpass	12–12	-0.03	9%	17 Feb →
dust2	9–13	0.01	36%	14 Feb →
nuke	1–13	0.01	17%	9 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.04	26%	28 Dec →
office	13–9	0.07	50%	28 Dec →
nuke	9–3	0.08	24%	22 Dec →
inferno	9–3	0.20	29%	22 Dec →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	19%	22 Dec →
vertigo	13–5	0.02	30%	21 Dec →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	10%	18 Dec →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	38%	18 Dec →
nuke	13–6	0.06	37%	18 Dec →
vertigo	13–8	-0.00	26%	16 Dec →
office	13–3	0.18	36%	16 Dec →
nuke	13–11	0.01	10%	14 Dec →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	23%	14 Dec →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	14%	13 Dec →
nuke	9–4	0.07	29%	13 Dec →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	16%	13 Dec →
nuke	12–12	0.03	34%	13 Dec →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	31%	12 Dec →
nuke	12–12	0.01	29%	12 Dec →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	33%	11 Dec →
vertigo	8–8	-0.07	21%	11 Dec →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	29%	10 Dec →
nuke	12–12	0.03	27%	9 Dec →
nuke	13–4	0.01	8%	9 Dec →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	39%	9 Dec →
nuke	13–10	0.03	68%	9 Dec →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	75%	8 Dec →
nuke	13–7	0.00	43%	8 Dec →
nuke	13–6	0.04	34%	8 Dec →
nuke	11–13	0.02	26%	7 Dec →
inferno	9–4	0.08	13%	7 Dec →
vertigo	4–9	-0.21	0%	7 Dec →
nuke	11–13	0.01	28%	5 Dec →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	42%	1 Dec →
nuke	12–12	0.02	36%	1 Dec →
nuke	13–7	0.00	33%	1 Dec →
nuke	11–13	0.02	28%	30 Nov →
nuke	6–13	0.00	36%	30 Nov →
nuke	12–12	-0.05	33%	30 Nov →