NattJr

NattJr — CS2 Stats

US76561198837504886[U:1:877239158]Steam profile ↗

6,535Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
8,256Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,139Purple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21385 of 49130 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,672 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.9%48.5%51.9%6.1% short
Shot accuracy10.0%13.3%13.7%3.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.080.09 short
Match win rate49.5%47.0%48.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNattJrFACEITLevel 9 · 1,672 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,139 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning42
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59401Last 10059%Win rateWLWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression3.4
Utility6.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.2
Utility6.7
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time639ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 12–12
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 17infernoWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315865%0.02
dust2A2112957%0.01
ancientS1714382%0.03
infernoC167944%0.01
nukeA106460%0.01
anubisB84450%-0.02
cache4040%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

179,640Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
10,059Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
45.9%Headshot %
10.0%Shot accuracy
24,005MVPs
4,206Hours (in match)
13,111Bombs planted
3,641Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,609
AWP15,324
MP97,900
MAC-105,268
FAMAS4,155

Lifetime map wins

17,915inferno
13,069dust2
6,431nuke
5,935vertigo
2,954train
645cbble
171lake
44office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,411Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
75.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage76952%1.0515.4
Ancient63550%0.9714.8
Dust253747%1.0015.0
Anubis48148%0.9814.6
Inferno40049%0.9914.6
Nuke15452%1.0015.4
Vertigo12349%1.0214.6
Overpass8759%1.0915.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
637msReaction time
22.1%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
13.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.0799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0324%29 Aug
mirage7–130.0720%29 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0116%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0521%27 Aug
ancient4–13-0.094%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0711%27 Aug
anubis13–100.0815%27 Aug
dust213–2-0.0046%26 Aug
inferno13–100.0819%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0320%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0311%10 Aug
nuke16–130.0727%7 Aug
inferno13–10.0417%7 Aug
cache6–13-0.085%1 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0218%31 Jul
ancient13–100.0020%31 Jul
anubis13–10-0.029%30 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0716%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0316%30 Jul
cache5–13-0.0026%30 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0238%30 Jul
inferno1–13-0.026%29 Jul
nuke13–100.0916%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0124%29 Jul
ancient16–140.0718%29 Jul
inferno13–30.0918%29 Jul
dust210–130.0028%29 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0420%29 Jul
mirage19–160.0019%29 Jul
mirage13–80.0722%28 Jul
ancient13–40.0524%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0320%28 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0515%28 Jul
ancient10–130.0223%24 Jul
dust210–130.0216%23 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0224%23 Jul
dust213–50.1033%23 Jul
dust23–13-0.0933%23 Jul
anubis18–22-0.0413%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0118%21 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0228%21 Jul
inferno13–100.0124%16 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0125%16 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0143%15 Jul
mirage7–10-0.0614%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0519%15 Jul
nuke10–130.0122%9 Jul
cache5–13-0.0021%9 Jul
ancient13–30.0624%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0723%9 Jul
mirage13–110.0112%9 Jul
dust23–13-0.0857%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0632%8 Jul
dust213–70.0411%1 Jul
mirage13–70.0329%1 Jul
nuke13–70.0017%30 Jun
mirage19–170.0418%30 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0223%29 Jun
mirage16–140.0336%28 Jun
dust213–6-0.0120%28 Jun
inferno4–130.0543%27 Jun
mirage12–120.1222%22 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0011%21 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0324%20 Jun
ancient13–70.0319%19 Jun
nuke2–13-0.1124%19 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0816%19 Jun
dust27–130.0119%19 Jun
mirage0–2-0.030%18 Jun
ancient13–50.0820%18 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0116%17 Jun
inferno16–19-0.0220%17 Jun
mirage9–130.0115%16 Jun
ancient13–100.0130%15 Jun
ancient13–50.0316%14 Jun
dust213–100.0318%14 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0435%12 Jun
nuke10–130.0917%12 Jun
ancient13–20.0933%12 Jun
mirage13–20.1027%12 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0511%12 Jun
dust216–13-0.0018%12 Jun
ancient13–30.0519%12 Jun
inferno7–130.0215%11 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0218%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0027%10 Jun
dust213–70.0221%10 Jun
dust213–110.0115%10 Jun
dust27–130.1028%10 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0428%10 Jun
inferno13–60.0117%10 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0128%8 Jun
nuke13–100.0514%8 Jun
ancient11–130.0219%8 Jun
mirage13–40.1133%8 Jun
dust213–7-0.0320%7 Jun
dust29–130.0521%7 Jun
inferno13–90.0123%7 Jun
dust213–110.0131%6 Jun
dust213–70.1116%6 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →