shinoa

shinoa — CS2 Stats

76561198818344957[U:1:858079229]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

465Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
400Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate44.2%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy10.7%12.1%10.9%meets
Kill/death ratio1.150.990.99above
Match win rate48.0%43.9%44.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshinoaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning54
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY454411Last 10045%Win rateLLLWTLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression6.3
Utility6.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time593ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–5
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B33171652%-0.00
mirageC125742%-0.00
infernoA116555%0.01
nukeA116555%-0.01
cacheD82625%-0.00
officeD62433%-0.02
vertigoD62433%0.01
ancientD51420%-0.01
overpass32167%-0.00
anubis31233%0.02
shelter1010%0.02
stronghold110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,249Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
923Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
44.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
10.7%Shot accuracy
2,342MVPs
400Hours (in match)
1,603Bombs planted
302Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,158dust2
1,098inferno
603nuke
488vertigo
133office
110train
7italy
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
580msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
13.19HE damage / grenade
13.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0692% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9612% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0120%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0215%25 Aug
cache2–13-0.0715%12 Aug
office13–80.0818%12 Aug
cache12–120.0013%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0613%11 Aug
dust213–6-0.0313%11 Aug
dust213–90.0416%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0221%8 Aug
dust213–20.0318%8 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0212%2 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0111%2 Aug
dust213–110.0216%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.038%1 Aug
office11–130.0113%1 Aug
ancient13–110.039%1 Aug
office12–120.057%13 Jul
inferno5–13-0.022%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0018%13 Jul
inferno12–120.0313%12 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0320%12 Jul
cache13–20.013%12 Jul
dust212–12-0.0312%12 Jul
mirage13–30.007%12 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0412%12 Jul
dust213–40.0414%11 Jul
shelter3–130.0213%11 Jul
nuke13–50.0310%11 Jul
inferno13–100.0313%11 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0517%9 Jul
office4–13-0.0912%9 Jul
dust212–120.0010%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0812%11 Jun
office13–7-0.0814%11 Jun
dust22–130.0122%11 Jun
dust23–13-0.0417%9 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0721%9 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0617%9 Jun
office8–13-0.077%6 Jun
vertigo6–130.0215%6 Jun
cache4–13-0.0412%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0413%5 Jun
dust210–13-0.059%14 May
dust213–70.0412%12 May
dust213–40.1016%12 May
cache10–130.0320%12 May
cache12–120.0224%7 May
cache13–60.0111%7 May
cache12–12-0.0021%7 May
dust210–130.0413%25 Apr
dust213–100.0319%25 Apr
nuke13–20.1017%13 Apr
mirage13–50.1113%13 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0413%9 Apr
overpass7–13-0.046%9 Apr
mirage7–130.0215%7 Apr
inferno10–130.0210%6 Apr
dust213–80.0818%3 Apr
dust213–110.0119%3 Apr
nuke13–50.0724%3 Apr
dust24–13-0.0710%3 Apr
ancient3–50.058%3 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0414%28 Mar
dust27–13-0.0112%28 Mar
mirage2–13-0.087%21 Mar
ancient8–13-0.047%21 Mar
dust21–13-0.054%18 Mar
anubis13–70.1015%18 Mar
overpass13–100.0622%18 Mar
dust23–8-0.040%25 Feb
dust211–13-0.0315%25 Feb
dust213–80.0215%23 Feb
inferno12–120.0114%23 Feb
mirage13–80.0615%22 Feb
vertigo5–130.0019%22 Feb
mirage2–130.0411%20 Feb
dust213–40.0519%20 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0019%20 Feb
inferno13–50.0312%20 Feb
anubis12–12-0.047%11 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0511%11 Feb
vertigo11–130.009%11 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.0214%10 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0410%10 Feb
dust213–10-0.0320%10 Feb
dust213–5-0.029%10 Feb
dust211–13-0.057%10 Feb
inferno13–70.0116%10 Feb
dust211–13-0.028%7 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0919%7 Feb
anubis12–120.0112%7 Feb
dust213–6-0.0210%7 Feb
stronghold13–8-0.043%7 Feb
dust213–110.0023%4 Feb
inferno13–7-0.007%4 Feb
dust213–3-0.0510%4 Feb
mirage6–130.0020%3 Feb
dust29–13-0.047%3 Feb
vertigo13–30.1020%3 Feb
mirage13–90.0419%3 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →