칸도샤 — CS2 Stats

76561198799589772[U:1:839324044]

1,895Tracked matches28%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,683Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate37.9%42.1%42.5%4.6% short
Shot accuracy9.7%12.1%10.9%1.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.430.990.99above
Match win rate71.7%43.9%44.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG칸도샤FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning35
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48484Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.2
Aggression4.0
Utility4.9
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.86 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 665ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning3.5
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time675ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 675ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 13–2
131Biggest win — edin
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2261627%-0.02
mirageB157847%-0.01
infernoA149564%0.01
anubisA148657%-0.01
nukeB137654%-0.00
ancientC125742%-0.01
edin42250%0.00
train220100%0.00
office1010%-0.02
italy1010%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,650Lifetime kills
1.43K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players
9,201Matches
71.7%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 3 players
37.9%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
9,070MVPs
1,688Hours (in match)
3,859Bombs planted
797Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,361
AWP8,289
MP92,573
SSG 082,422
MAC-102,246
SG 5532,131

Lifetime map wins

7,930inferno
7,290nuke
3,559dust2
2,178vertigo
707office
351lake
337assault
284train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
24.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.4%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
665msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.86Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
15.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0675% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.010%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0212%28 Aug
nuke7–10.0829%28 Aug
dust26–130.0114%28 Aug
nuke10–130.0117%22 Aug
nuke5–13-0.096%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.017%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0710%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0820%21 Jul
dust213–6-0.019%20 Jul
mirage5–130.0323%15 Apr
dust29–13-0.0317%14 Apr
inferno14–160.0018%12 Apr
dust28–13-0.0320%12 Apr
anubis4–13-0.066%9 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0613%5 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0116%5 Apr
ancient9–130.0215%4 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0616%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0221%4 Apr
dust28–13-0.0122%4 Apr
anubis1–7-0.088%4 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0721%3 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0518%31 Mar
anubis13–80.0118%31 Mar
dust27–13-0.0226%31 Mar
mirage13–80.0133%26 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0321%26 Mar
inferno13–90.0116%23 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0412%23 Mar
inferno13–30.0114%23 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0134%23 Mar
ancient13–7-0.026%23 Mar
inferno9–7-0.1327%22 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0511%20 Mar
dust24–13-0.0831%19 Mar
anubis13–110.0518%19 Mar
nuke7–130.0922%19 Mar
dust25–13-0.0015%19 Mar
mirage13–100.0314%19 Mar
anubis13–160.0316%19 Mar
office12–12-0.0228%19 Mar
edin13–80.0620%19 Mar
edin4–130.0216%18 Mar
edin13–1-0.0243%18 Mar
dust213–70.0614%17 Mar
ancient11–13-0.068%15 Mar
mirage16–13-0.057%15 Mar
train13–110.0118%15 Mar
dust213–70.0317%14 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0511%14 Mar
inferno13–10.0323%14 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0210%14 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0410%13 Mar
mirage13–30.0116%13 Mar
train13–70.0017%13 Mar
inferno13–80.0321%13 Mar
inferno13–20.0713%13 Mar
mirage7–13-0.015%13 Mar
dust215–15-0.0519%13 Mar
mirage5–130.0123%13 Mar
ancient13–60.0311%11 Mar
anubis13–100.0210%11 Mar
dust210–13-0.0123%11 Mar
dust210–13-0.075%11 Mar
mirage7–130.0021%11 Mar
dust211–130.0119%10 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0117%10 Mar
nuke13–60.0727%10 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0615%10 Mar
nuke16–12-0.0415%10 Mar
ancient13–30.0110%10 Mar
inferno3–130.0111%10 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0013%10 Mar
dust213–30.0215%9 Mar
inferno13–160.0322%9 Mar
ancient15–150.0112%9 Mar
inferno13–20.1015%9 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0319%9 Mar
dust24–13-0.090%8 Mar
inferno13–60.0630%7 Mar
inferno13–11-0.019%7 Mar
anubis13–60.0115%6 Mar
dust25–13-0.0311%5 Mar
italy4–13-0.0433%2 Mar
dust213–50.0023%1 Mar
edin11–13-0.0733%1 Mar
nuke13–10-0.059%1 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0216%1 Mar
vertigo13–70.0429%1 Mar
dust26–13-0.0414%1 Mar
dust29–13-0.097%1 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0119%28 Feb
ancient13–20.0111%28 Feb
mirage13–100.0115%27 Feb
anubis13–110.0524%26 Feb
ancient13–80.0015%26 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0218%25 Feb
nuke13–100.0016%25 Feb
dust29–130.0831%25 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →