Plea$ure

Plea$ure — CS2 Stats

76561198771551072[U:1:811285344]Steam profile ↗

61Tracked matches39%Win rate2025Tracked since
249Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.1 Learning
Premier CS Rating2,532Grey band · top ~89.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23271 of 29733 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate34.6%40.1%5.5% short
Shot accuracy0.0%7.6%7.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.610.920.31 short
Match win rate35.7%42.2%6.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Light Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlea$urePREMIER2,532 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim23
Positioning42
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY20382Last 6033%Win rateWTWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.3
Aggression4.3
Utility1.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.3
Positioning4.2
Utility1.4
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact1.4

Composite 2.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time697ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 697ms
Headshot accuracy9.0%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 8.3% → last ⅓ avg 9.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 60 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.06Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — nuke
2Longest win streak
26In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD1941521%-0.06
dust2D1751229%-0.04
nukeA116555%-0.04
anubisD71614%-0.03
cache330100%-0.02
inferno110100%-0.05
ancient1010%-0.11
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 60 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,939Lifetime kills
0.61K/D
460Matches
35.7%Match win rate
34.6%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
375MVPs
135Hours (in match)
257Bombs planted
73Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

809dust2
299nuke
279inferno
195vertigo
51train
20italy
18office
6ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.1%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
61.1%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
675msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.23Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.29HE damage / grenade
1.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.4989° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.0625% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2297 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–4-0.070%27 Aug
mirage15–15-0.067%26 Aug
cache11–3-0.008%26 Aug
anubis10–13-0.036%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0113%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0210%22 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0317%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.129%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.017%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.064%18 Aug
dust213–9-0.0216%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.180%16 Aug
anubis8–130.0511%24 May
nuke13–30.069%24 May
mirage6–13-0.0410%18 May
nuke6–13-0.076%16 May
inferno13–10-0.0514%14 May
dust25–13-0.0020%13 May
cache13–40.0010%30 Apr
dust211–13-0.054%29 Apr
dust24–13-0.0525%24 Apr
mirage1–13-0.056%24 Apr
anubis13–8-0.026%18 Apr
dust25–130.0015%14 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0217%12 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0411%11 Apr
mirage3–13-0.109%10 Apr
dust23–13-0.0212%9 Apr
nuke4–13-0.057%7 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0010%5 Apr
dust213–6-0.007%4 Apr
mirage13–70.0610%3 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0318%31 Mar
mirage5–10-0.027%31 Mar
nuke13–7-0.044%30 Mar
dust210–13-0.0812%28 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0914%28 Mar
nuke11–13-0.067%25 Mar
mirage13–10-0.038%20 Mar
mirage2–6-0.0711%19 Mar
nuke13–0-0.024%11 Mar
dust23–7-0.056%10 Mar
dust28–13-0.054%10 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0412%10 Mar
nuke13–11-0.106%9 Mar
ancient4–6-0.110%9 Mar
dust26–13-0.0311%7 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0822%7 Mar
anubis5–13-0.144%6 Mar
mirage10–13-0.048%27 Feb
nuke13–20.013%27 Feb
mirage9–13-0.099%24 Feb
mirage6–13-0.126%19 Feb
anubis11–13-0.047%18 Feb
mirage5–13-0.113%17 Feb
dust25–13-0.0618%21 Dec
dust22–60.0517%20 Dec
dust213–11-0.076%20 Dec
mirage0–13-0.0820%20 Dec
vertigo6–13-0.040%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →