DMamaY — CS2 Stats

76561198447471754[U:1:487206026]

396Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
198Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate50.7%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy2.8%12.9%12.1%9.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.000.99meets
Match win rate47.4%42.9%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDMamaYFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning47
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47512Last 10047%Win rateWWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression4.9
Utility4.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time575ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — office 8–1
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22101245%-0.00
mirageC2081240%-0.03
nukeC1771041%-0.03
infernoB137654%-0.01
ancientS128467%0.02
overpassS54180%-0.02
officeA53260%-0.02
anubis3030%-0.05
cache2020%0.02
alpine1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,271Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
529Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 2 players
50.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
2.8%Shot accuracy
1,215MVPs
198Hours (in match)
545Bombs planted
113Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,053dust2
870inferno
834nuke
285vertigo
195office
174train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.7%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
568msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.80HE damage / grenade
7.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9267% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0722%24 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0813%26 May
nuke12–160.0314%25 May
ancient13–7-0.0617%25 May
nuke4–13-0.0520%24 May
dust27–130.0325%20 May
ancient11–130.0612%18 May
anubis1–9-0.0835%18 May
nuke5–13-0.0411%18 May
inferno10–13-0.0630%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0230%18 May
inferno13–10-0.0020%18 May
mirage13–50.0116%18 May
dust215–150.0218%18 May
mirage5–130.0011%17 May
inferno13–50.0220%17 May
dust26–13-0.0723%17 May
mirage6–13-0.0325%17 May
nuke4–13-0.097%13 May
dust28–13-0.0313%12 May
ancient13–80.0418%12 May
mirage13–10-0.0620%12 May
cache11–130.0218%12 May
cache6–130.0218%12 May
dust216–13-0.0526%8 May
dust213–80.0212%27 Apr
nuke11–130.0127%27 Apr
ancient5–13-0.076%27 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0415%27 Apr
dust213–110.0122%26 Apr
dust211–130.0418%22 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0926%22 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0122%22 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0615%22 Apr
mirage13–60.0511%21 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0424%20 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0310%20 Apr
dust213–11-0.0012%20 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0321%20 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0635%19 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0121%16 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0231%16 Apr
office7–13-0.0616%16 Apr
mirage13–1-0.1020%16 Apr
office8–10.1136%16 Apr
nuke13–70.0120%15 Apr
overpass13–80.0418%15 Apr
dust213–8-0.0019%15 Apr
ancient7–130.0029%15 Apr
dust29–13-0.0515%15 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0219%14 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0613%11 Apr
office1–13-0.0925%10 Apr
office4–10.0120%9 Apr
alpine6–130.0123%9 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0519%9 Apr
office13–10-0.0711%9 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0718%9 Apr
dust24–13-0.0016%9 Apr
ancient13–20.1030%9 Apr
dust28–13-0.0331%7 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0126%7 Apr
ancient13–60.0724%6 Apr
inferno8–130.0127%6 Apr
nuke16–14-0.0220%6 Apr
nuke13–100.0015%2 Apr
dust20–13-0.0132%31 Mar
overpass1–13-0.078%31 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0210%27 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0419%26 Mar
inferno16–140.0631%25 Mar
nuke13–16-0.0525%24 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0918%24 Mar
mirage6–13-0.1027%23 Mar
mirage13–70.0118%23 Mar
dust25–130.0312%23 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0413%23 Mar
mirage12–16-0.0217%23 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0022%22 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0125%22 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0220%22 Mar
inferno13–80.0419%22 Mar
mirage10–130.0013%22 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0214%21 Mar
dust213–20.0220%21 Mar
overpass13–110.0119%20 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0325%17 Mar
nuke12–16-0.0233%17 Mar
dust28–10.0916%17 Mar
dust28–13-0.0724%16 Mar
dust213–100.0632%16 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0717%16 Mar
dust213–8-0.0220%13 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0615%13 Mar
ancient13–80.0122%13 Mar
dust28–40.0227%13 Mar
dust22–13-0.0528%13 Mar
inferno15–150.0324%12 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0323%12 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0323%11 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →