mof

mof — CS2 Stats

CA76561198433751329[U:1:473485601]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,592Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,380Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=230), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate43.0%41.1%41.2%above
Shot accuracy9.5%14.1%12.5%3.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.900.970.960.07 short
Match win rate42.3%41.9%42.8%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmofFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning37
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression3.7
Utility5.1
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning3.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time599ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — office 13–6
131Biggest win — vertigo
6Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB189950%-0.01
dust2B178947%-0.01
vertigoC146843%0.00
nukeB126650%-0.00
mirageA95456%-0.01
ancientC73443%-0.01
cacheA53260%-0.00
anubisD51420%-0.01
trainA53260%-0.01
inferno32167%-0.01
overpass220100%0.01
shelter2020%-0.08
fachwerk1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,781Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
3,814Matches
42.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 1 players
43.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 1 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
6,914MVPs
1,426Hours (in match)
3,612Bombs planted
622Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,304
AWP4,352
SSG 082,609
MAC-101,728
MP91,153
MP7907

Lifetime map wins

5,837dust2
3,871office
3,563inferno
2,533nuke
2,009vertigo
1,088train
534cbble
280italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
13.0°Preaim
595msReaction time
24.2%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
10.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0008° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–100.0214%30 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.0225%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0610%29 Aug
cache13–8-0.0119%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0411%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.057%28 Aug
office13–11-0.007%27 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0521%26 Aug
cache13–50.0320%26 Aug
overpass13–90.0011%25 Aug
vertigo13–10.0637%25 Aug
dust213–2-0.000%24 Aug
ancient9–130.009%23 Aug
office9–13-0.0810%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.0415%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0121%22 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0214%21 Aug
vertigo11–130.0420%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0847%20 Aug
ancient12–120.0916%20 Aug
nuke13–50.0218%20 Aug
office10–13-0.0824%20 Aug
mirage12–4-0.0521%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0310%19 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.078%18 Aug
nuke12–120.0317%17 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0626%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0112%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0215%16 Aug
vertigo13–10.1015%16 Aug
dust27–3-0.0315%16 Aug
office6–13-0.0118%16 Aug
office13–4-0.0013%14 Aug
dust29–130.0314%14 Aug
nuke11–130.0013%13 Aug
train13–90.0110%13 Aug
cache11–130.0211%13 Aug
office12–12-0.0129%12 Aug
train13–7-0.0214%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0313%12 Aug
dust213–7-0.014%12 Aug
office10–13-0.036%11 Aug
shelter1–13-0.097%11 Aug
office7–13-0.0310%10 Aug
inferno13–6-0.049%10 Aug
train13–110.0119%9 Aug
mirage13–3-0.045%9 Aug
office4–13-0.038%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0416%8 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0615%8 Aug
vertigo2–13-0.0632%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.0322%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.0419%7 Aug
mirage4–130.0123%7 Aug
dust21–12-0.0416%7 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0214%7 Aug
fachwerk6–13-0.0316%7 Aug
vertigo8–130.0411%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0311%6 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0215%6 Aug
mirage5–130.109%6 Aug
dust213–100.0221%6 Aug
inferno8–130.0124%6 Aug
office13–80.0110%6 Aug
train9–130.0116%6 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0214%5 Aug
nuke5–130.0015%5 Aug
overpass13–90.0212%5 Aug
nuke8–10.1111%5 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0211%5 Aug
vertigo13–30.0024%5 Aug
dust213–60.0914%5 Aug
dust213–10.0618%5 Aug
vertigo7–130.0127%4 Aug
vertigo13–110.0024%4 Aug
nuke9–130.018%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0313%4 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0314%4 Aug
vertigo10–130.0112%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.107%3 Aug
ancient8–13-0.064%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0216%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.008%2 Aug
office13–7-0.0030%2 Aug
office8–40.0314%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0210%1 Aug
office13–60.1214%1 Aug
train3–13-0.0514%1 Aug
nuke13–70.0416%31 Jul
office13–10-0.0122%31 Jul
ancient4–4-0.0210%30 Jul
office11–13-0.0113%28 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0216%27 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.028%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.014%24 Jul
office13–50.0417%23 Jul
office6–13-0.077%23 Jul
anubis12–120.0212%23 Jul
shelter12–12-0.079%23 Jul
anubis9–20.0212%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →