IEatWaffles — CS2 Stats

76561198410254123[U:1:449988395]

2,086Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,918Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,155Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4283 of 13221 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,219 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIEatWafflesFACEITLevel 6 · 1,219 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,155 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning60
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateLLWWWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression5.9
Utility7.5
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.0
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time598ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–7
130Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2011955%0.01
infernoC1981142%0.02
ancientA1710759%0.01
mirageB178947%0.02
dust2S129375%0.01
nukeB84450%-0.02
cacheA74357%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

203,888Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
7,549Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
46.4%Headshot %
18.8%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Pink band
18,218MVPs
6,918Hours (in match)
17,450Bombs planted
2,531Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4764,485
AWP18,553
P2506,410
FAMAS3,989

Lifetime map wins

25,409inferno
6,295dust2
2,575train
1,837nuke
1,091vertigo
705cbble
57lake
9office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,754Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
79.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10043%1.1916.2
Inferno6854%1.2217.3
Dust26746%1.0515.3
Ancient5947%1.0515.9
Anubis4860%1.1715.4
Nuke2839%0.9415.7
Cache2050%1.0815.4
Train650%0.7512.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
10.58HE damage / grenade
22.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6548% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0226%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.049%27 Aug
ancient13–90.0318%25 Aug
nuke13–0-0.0217%24 Aug
anubis13–110.1312%24 Aug
anubis8–13-0.074%24 Aug
dust213–90.0215%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0411%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0521%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0017%17 Aug
mirage13–30.0822%17 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0822%17 Aug
inferno13–90.0619%15 Aug
anubis13–40.0313%14 Aug
dust213–90.0218%14 Aug
inferno15–150.0116%11 Aug
inferno13–90.0421%11 Aug
inferno13–80.0113%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0020%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0729%9 Aug
anubis13–90.0515%8 Aug
dust213–50.1113%1 Aug
cache13–60.0320%1 Aug
nuke13–70.0314%30 Jul
ancient16–13-0.029%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0019%29 Jul
dust219–15-0.0327%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0414%29 Jul
inferno14–160.1017%29 Jul
inferno15–15-0.055%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0017%29 Jul
ancient13–50.0618%29 Jul
ancient8–130.019%29 Jul
dust213–4-0.0015%29 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0710%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0813%28 Jul
inferno8–13-0.034%28 Jul
anubis5–130.0411%28 Jul
anubis13–10-0.067%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0014%26 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0511%26 Jul
dust213–11-0.038%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0613%25 Jul
cache16–130.0116%25 Jul
anubis14–160.0312%25 Jul
inferno13–50.0413%25 Jul
dust213–9-0.0421%25 Jul
mirage13–60.059%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0413%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0522%23 Jul
ancient15–150.066%23 Jul
anubis13–60.0412%23 Jul
cache13–8-0.0211%23 Jul
cache15–150.0717%21 Jul
inferno13–110.0617%21 Jul
cache8–130.0420%19 Jul
ancient4–13-0.008%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.0113%18 Jul
mirage13–160.0119%18 Jul
ancient13–60.0726%18 Jul
anubis13–50.0813%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0413%14 Jul
anubis19–160.0511%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0114%12 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0210%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0015%12 Jul
mirage8–130.0120%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0430%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0217%11 Jul
inferno13–10.0717%11 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0615%9 Jul
ancient13–20.0718%9 Jul
mirage13–60.1029%9 Jul
dust210–13-0.0312%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0516%8 Jul
nuke13–2-0.048%7 Jul
anubis13–60.0316%6 Jul
mirage11–130.048%3 Jul
inferno13–50.0523%3 Jul
anubis13–70.1510%3 Jul
dust213–110.1115%3 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0014%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0919%3 Jul
dust213–50.0525%3 Jul
inferno13–40.0612%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0711%2 Jul
ancient13–10.0624%2 Jul
anubis5–13-0.018%1 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0632%1 Jul
inferno3–130.0125%1 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0414%1 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0514%30 Jun
anubis13–70.0138%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0321%26 Jun
cache16–14-0.0218%26 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0119%26 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0323%25 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0413%25 Jun
nuke13–80.0233%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0318%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →