BeardedHobbits — CS2 Stats

76561198403392252[U:1:443126524]

260Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning43
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44488Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.3
Utility3.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.3
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time608ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–7
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 21nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%-0.01
mirageB21111052%-0.01
nukeC145936%0.00
ancientC104640%-0.01
infernoC104640%-0.01
overpassC83538%-0.04
cacheC73443%-0.01
anubis31233%0.02
train31233%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
33%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
82.1ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10%0.6911.0
Ancient10%0.9521.0
Mirage1100%1.6922.0
Inferno10%0.8218.0
Nuke1100%1.6213.0
Vertigo10%0.406.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
602msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
5.63HE damage / grenade
3.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1217 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5885% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–130.026%27 Aug
nuke13–160.0320%27 Aug
mirage13–110.009%24 Aug
dust213–160.0117%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0213%24 Aug
ancient15–150.0519%24 Aug
dust213–50.0126%23 Aug
cache5–13-0.0824%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0114%23 Aug
dust213–100.0123%14 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0224%27 Jul
nuke13–100.0522%27 Jul
dust213–70.1124%19 Jul
ancient10–130.0122%19 Jul
dust213–10.0331%19 Jul
mirage5–130.0019%19 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0222%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0318%15 Jul
ancient12–120.0019%8 Jul
nuke6–130.0217%8 Jul
cache13–7-0.0411%8 Jul
dust215–15-0.0818%19 Jun
nuke7–130.0411%19 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0730%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0112%9 May
cache4–130.0113%9 May
nuke13–9-0.0312%7 May
mirage2–13-0.084%6 May
inferno15–15-0.0211%6 May
cache6–00.039%4 May
cache9–13-0.0320%4 May
cache12–12-0.0114%4 May
cache13–00.0335%4 May
mirage8–13-0.0313%9 Apr
dust213–60.0511%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0616%6 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0513%6 Apr
dust210–13-0.0215%4 Apr
dust213–60.0314%4 Apr
inferno13–40.0815%27 Mar
dust213–30.0516%27 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0519%27 Mar
mirage13–80.0216%27 Mar
nuke13–90.0529%27 Mar
dust213–8-0.0512%27 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0219%27 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0622%27 Mar
ancient2–13-0.085%27 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0311%27 Mar
inferno14–16-0.056%25 Mar
dust22–13-0.0615%25 Mar
dust24–0-0.0150%25 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0412%22 Mar
nuke7–13-0.059%21 Mar
mirage16–140.0219%21 Mar
ancient13–80.0216%18 Mar
nuke13–60.0110%18 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0216%9 Feb
mirage13–40.0414%8 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0414%30 Jan
mirage9–0-0.0315%1 Jan
inferno8–13-0.037%28 Dec
dust29–13-0.0717%21 Oct
mirage16–140.0312%28 Sept
mirage9–13-0.064%28 Sept
overpass15–15-0.0118%27 Sept
mirage13–100.0611%24 Sept
inferno13–40.0711%24 Sept
nuke2–13-0.018%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0213%14 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0314%12 Sept
ancient10–13-0.069%12 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0614%20 Aug
dust20–13-0.0715%18 Aug
dust23–13-0.089%18 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0523%18 Aug
mirage13–30.0514%12 Aug
overpass8–13-0.085%8 Aug
train6–13-0.0420%3 Aug
overpass13–100.0015%3 Aug
inferno7–13-0.019%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.044%3 Aug
train12–120.1014%3 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0115%30 Jul
overpass6–40.0114%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0114%29 Jul
dust26–13-0.0713%29 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0019%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0613%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0216%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0216%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0014%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0313%20 Jul
mirage6–130.0219%20 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0715%20 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0618%20 Jul
train13–100.0310%20 Jul
nuke8–13-0.015%11 Jul
anubis13–80.0620%11 Jul
ancient13–40.076%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →