Desean Strickland — CS2 Stats

76561198398609778[U:1:438344050]

827Tracked matches64%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,491Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,181Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1451 of 14591 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,563 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDesean StricklandFACEITLevel 8 · 1,563 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,181 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning53
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateLLWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression6.3
Utility6.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time589ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–1
130Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 90% over 10anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22101245%0.02
cacheS1711665%0.02
mirageB126650%-0.00
infernoA116555%0.03
ancientS109190%0.04
anubisD92722%0.03
nukeS86275%-0.00
vertigoB63350%0.03
train21150%0.10
office2020%0.06
overpass110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,650Lifetime kills
3.32K/D · Top 1% of tracked players
1,877Matches
43.2%Match win rate
80.8%Headshot % · Top 1% of tracked players
5.4%Shot accuracy
4,491MVPs
825Hours (in match)
2,544Bombs planted
907Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4790,446
AWP2,674
FAMAS1,514
MP91,265
P250828

Lifetime map wins

2,564inferno
1,701dust2
1,574nuke
660train
413vertigo
160cbble
31office
25safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
42.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.5%Spray accuracy
88.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
586msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
14.8%Flash assists
11.07HE damage / grenade
10.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.451% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.046%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0813%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0011%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0122%20 Aug
ancient13–50.0726%20 Aug
dust211–130.0217%19 Aug
nuke13–30.0817%8 Aug
inferno9–10.2220%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.079%5 Aug
dust213–60.1312%5 Aug
cache4–13-0.0510%5 Aug
cache8–13-0.0116%5 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0426%28 Jul
anubis12–120.0919%27 Jul
inferno13–20.0619%25 Jul
anubis12–120.0126%24 Jul
nuke5–0-0.0729%24 Jul
vertigo13–70.0116%24 Jul
cache7–130.0322%23 Jul
cache13–70.1113%23 Jul
nuke13–80.0113%21 Jul
dust213–60.0923%21 Jul
dust29–130.0215%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0116%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0319%20 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0124%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0215%20 Jul
train13–100.0413%20 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0310%20 Jul
anubis7–130.0112%19 Jul
cache13–30.1416%19 Jul
inferno13–40.0911%19 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0120%19 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0116%19 Jul
nuke13–50.0513%19 Jul
cache13–80.0414%19 Jul
ancient13–00.0114%18 Jul
ancient13–100.0919%18 Jul
anubis10–130.0318%18 Jul
cache13–110.0116%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0013%18 Jul
mirage13–6-0.004%18 Jul
dust22–13-0.0517%17 Jul
dust213–50.0419%17 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0110%17 Jul
dust215–15-0.0017%17 Jul
dust213–40.067%17 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0025%17 Jul
dust212–160.0323%17 Jul
office10–130.1130%17 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0650%17 Jul
mirage13–70.0627%17 Jul
cache13–20.0536%17 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0211%16 Jul
anubis11–130.0217%16 Jul
dust213–100.0413%16 Jul
cache16–130.0910%16 Jul
cache13–60.0225%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0021%16 Jul
cache5–130.0326%16 Jul
cache13–11-0.0311%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0417%16 Jul
ancient16–130.057%16 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0115%15 Jul
mirage15–150.0014%15 Jul
ancient13–10.1012%15 Jul
dust213–70.0614%15 Jul
dust213–70.038%15 Jul
dust214–160.0017%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0412%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0217%14 Jul
ancient13–110.0315%14 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0421%14 Jul
office12–120.0130%14 Jul
overpass13–50.0722%14 Jul
dust213–80.0421%14 Jul
dust25–130.0123%14 Jul
ancient4–130.0414%14 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0214%14 Jul
cache13–80.0118%14 Jul
vertigo13–40.0211%14 Jul
nuke13–110.0412%14 Jul
train5–130.1519%14 Jul
dust28–13-0.0419%14 Jul
inferno13–110.0119%13 Jul
inferno13–90.0413%13 Jul
dust23–130.016%13 Jul
vertigo10–130.0214%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0419%9 Jul
dust213–70.0110%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0416%9 Jul
dust213–10-0.0218%9 Jul
cache8–130.0226%9 Jul
nuke5–8-0.006%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.0912%8 Jul
vertigo10–130.0630%8 Jul
anubis12–120.1224%8 Jul
vertigo10–130.1028%8 Jul
cache13–90.0530%8 Jul
dust211–13-0.0116%7 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →