⑪ ✓ Pettmann2 — CS2 Stats
76561198396995544[U:1:436729816]✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 6 median | Level 7 median | vs Level 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 44.3% | 44.9% | 46.2% | 1.9% short |
| Shot accuracy | 15.7% | 11.8% | 12.5% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.10 | 1.04 | 1.06 | above |
| Match win rate | 42.0% | 45.3% | 45.9% | 3.8% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 42 | 21–21 | 50% | -0.00 | |
| A | 20 | 11–9 | 55% | 0.00 | |
| B | 12 | 6–6 | 50% | 0.01 | |
| S | 12 | 8–4 | 67% | -0.00 | |
| S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.00 | |
| — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.00 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.06 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.10 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 42). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 80 | 54% | 0.86 | 12.7 |
| Nuke | 26 | 69% | 0.88 | 14.5 |
| Dust2 | 24 | 46% | 0.97 | 15.1 |
| Anubis | 21 | 52% | 0.90 | 13.7 |
| Inferno | 18 | 44% | 0.95 | 15.2 |
| Ancient | 11 | 36% | 0.90 | 15.0 |
| Train | 7 | 71% | 1.04 | 13.9 |
| Overpass | 6 | 17% | 0.52 | 9.2 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3768 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.3966% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 22% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 0–3 | -0.05 | 0% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.06 | 25% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 10% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.05 | 13% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.06 | 17% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 9% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 18% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 16% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.03 | 26% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 19% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.13 | 21% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.05 | 16% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.04 | 16% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 18% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 4 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 15% | 4 Jun → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.03 | 12% | 4 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 13% | 4 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 12% | 4 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 30% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 21% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 16% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.06 | 22% | 29 Mar → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.02 | 23% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.11 | 25% | 23 Mar → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.10 | 17% | 23 Mar → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 21% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.08 | 14% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 19% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.17 | 20% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.03 | 20% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.07 | 17% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.02 | 20% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 11% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.00 | 17% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 11% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 19 Feb → | ||
| 3–10 | -0.04 | 17% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 19% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 17% | 11 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 20% | 10 Feb → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.00 | 14% | 10 Feb → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 17% | 10 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 18% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.09 | 9% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 9% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.01 | 12% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 5–9 | -0.06 | 16% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 5% | 4 Feb → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 24% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 9% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 20% | 9 Jan → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.03 | 27% | 9 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 7 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.02 | 28% | 7 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.06 | 16% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 13% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 5 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.05 | 28% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 20% | 31 Dec → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.00 | 10% | 29 Dec → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.03 | 8% | 26 Dec → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.03 | 11% | 26 Dec → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 15% | 22 Dec → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 22% | 21 Dec → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 16% | 21 Dec → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 20% | 21 Dec → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 17 Dec → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.06 | 12% | 17 Dec → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.03 | 21% | 16 Dec → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.05 | 10% | 16 Dec → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 14 Dec → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.06 | 10% | 14 Dec → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.08 | 13% | 14 Dec → | ||
| 6–0 | 0.05 | 13% | 14 Dec → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 21% | 12 Dec → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 20% | 12 Dec → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 21% | 11 Dec → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 13% | 11 Dec → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 10 Dec → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.01 | 29% | 9 Dec → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 24% | 9 Dec → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 16% | 7 Dec → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.03 | 25% | 7 Dec → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.02 | 16% | 5 Dec → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 3 Dec → | ||
| 0–4 | -0.09 | 0% | 2 Dec → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 17% | 28 Nov → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.00 | 18% | 28 Nov → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 29% | 27 Nov → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 31% | 20 Nov → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 20% | 4 Nov → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
- 53Player 08025323 recent matches together
- 01Player 49970176 recent matches together
- 15Player 29021540 recent matches together
- 96Player 87259613 recent matches together
- 00Player 14630023 recent matches together
- 95Player 35949519 recent matches together
- 89Player 25008915 recent matches together
- 83Player 15758312 recent matches together