Silligate — CS2 Stats

US76561198395585455[U:1:435319727]Steam profile ↗

160Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since

529Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,611Blue band · top ~35.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16397 of 24419 tracked

WingmanSilver III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Blue band median	Purple band median	vs Purple band
Headshot rate	51.7%	41.7%	44.1%	above
Shot accuracy	15.2%	8.8%	11.4%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.60	0.97	1.03	0.43 short
Match win rate	41.1%	43.8%	45.2%	4.1% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning50

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6

Aggression4.6

Utility5.2

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.3

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.0

Utility5.2

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time601ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms

Headshot accuracy18.7%−7.4%

first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 16dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	C	19	8–11	42%	0.01
inferno	A	16	10–6	63%	0.01
nuke	C	16	7–9	44%	0.00
mirage	A	14	8–6	57%	0.04
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	0.02
anubis	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,178Lifetime kills

0.60K/D

811Matches

41.1%Match win rate

51.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band

15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Blue band

1,438MVPs

356Hours (in match)

676Bombs planted

195Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,711

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,950

P2000 / USP-S1,799

AWP1,588

Desert Eagle895

UMP-45577

Glock-18504

MP9201

MAC-10195

Tec-9191

Lifetime map wins

1,284inferno

1,048dust2

448nuke

113train

44cbble

37vertigo

8office

4ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.1%Spray accuracy

87.1%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

594msReaction time

26.9%T opening success

43.1%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

10.0%Flash assists

7.64HE damage / grenade

6.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.9168% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–4	-0.00	21%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.02	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	22%	28 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	22%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.05	25%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	5%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	18%	27 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.01	23%	27 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.01	28%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	14%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	26%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	19%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	21%	26 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	21%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.08	16%	26 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	21%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.15	22%	26 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.01	25%	26 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	12%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	26%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	15%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	20%	25 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.05	16%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.11	7%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.07	11%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	22%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.04	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.07	16%	20 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	18%	20 Aug →
anubis	9–2	0.07	36%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.06	19%	19 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.06	14%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.05	18%	19 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.04	27%	18 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.06	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.05	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.16	38%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	16%	18 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	24%	18 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	8%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.06	17%	17 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	35%	17 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.07	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.06	18%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	27%	15 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.03	12%	15 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.01	35%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	25%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.11	30%	14 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	23%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	24%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	34%	13 Aug →
anubis	2–13	0.01	22%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	24%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	33%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.05	37%	13 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.02	35%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	25%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	12%	11 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	11%	11 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	26%	30 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	28%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.00	16%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.11	29%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	23%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	29%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	44%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	32%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.00	21%	29 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.13	25%	28 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.06	32%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.11	25%	28 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	21%	28 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	30%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	23%	28 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	33%	28 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	23%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	22%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.06	41%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.04	14%	27 Jul →
inferno	10–5	0.00	45%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	19%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–9	0.02	25%	27 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	36%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	18%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	31%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	35%	26 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.00	27%	26 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	23%	26 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price