EridiumZX

EridiumZX — CS2 Stats

76561198395330700[U:1:435064972]Steam profile ↗

691Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,052Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate35.8%42.1%42.5%6.7% short
Shot accuracy14.1%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.960.990.990.03 short
Match win rate32.7%43.9%44.2%11.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEridiumZXFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY543610Last 10054%Win rateWLWTTLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression5.1
Utility4.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time622ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2381535%-0.05
vertigoB157847%0.00
nukeA149564%0.00
overpassS128467%-0.03
anubisS97278%-0.02
mirageA95456%-0.01
cacheA85363%-0.03
dust2A53260%0.01
office2020%0.03
train110100%0.01
sanctum110100%0.08
poseidon1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,737Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,186Matches
32.7%Match win rate
35.8%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,740MVPs
715Hours (in match)
1,215Bombs planted
257Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,961
AWP6,654
SSG 081,701
Knife976
MP9792

Lifetime map wins

4,119inferno
2,818dust2
781nuke
383vertigo
160train
80lake
62ar_shoots
47safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.35Avg K/D
ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
626msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
8.95HE damage / grenade
6.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4762 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0512%23 Aug
office4–13-0.0120%23 Aug
dust213–60.0323%9 Aug
office12–120.0610%9 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0923%4 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.053%29 May
anubis13–7-0.0411%29 May
vertigo13–110.0417%23 May
nuke13–10-0.0220%23 May
anubis13–11-0.0419%23 May
inferno9–6-0.0313%9 May
inferno7–13-0.0213%9 May
mirage1–13-0.0122%9 May
nuke13–11-0.0222%8 May
inferno6–13-0.0519%8 May
anubis13–70.0915%8 May
overpass13–6-0.0326%3 May
inferno10–13-0.0523%3 May
anubis8–13-0.0519%3 May
train13–50.0120%3 May
cache13–8-0.0320%3 May
overpass13–4-0.0711%2 May
inferno13–40.0438%2 May
anubis13–7-0.0315%2 May
vertigo13–8-0.0712%2 May
cache13–3-0.0317%2 May
cache13–1-0.0213%2 May
inferno11–13-0.0119%1 May
cache13–60.0415%1 May
cache8–13-0.0316%1 May
cache10–13-0.0815%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.0314%30 Apr
cache13–5-0.0514%30 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0616%25 Apr
inferno8–13-0.1012%12 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0227%12 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0410%12 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0319%2 Mar
inferno13–60.0122%2 Mar
dust210–13-0.039%23 Feb
vertigo5–13-0.0217%23 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0412%23 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0714%23 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0116%23 Feb
inferno6–9-0.088%23 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0112%22 Feb
anubis13–80.0211%22 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0517%22 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0316%22 Feb
mirage13–20.049%22 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0010%22 Feb
vertigo12–120.047%22 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0527%20 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0710%20 Feb
mirage13–10.0422%20 Feb
nuke12–12-0.0217%20 Feb
vertigo13–11-0.0111%20 Feb
inferno4–9-0.1643%20 Feb
inferno9–6-0.0810%20 Feb
vertigo9–30.0941%20 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0831%18 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0016%18 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0517%18 Feb
nuke13–20.0720%18 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0213%17 Feb
inferno13–80.0218%17 Feb
vertigo13–100.0122%17 Feb
inferno8–13-0.019%4 Feb
vertigo11–13-0.046%4 Feb
vertigo3–130.0412%4 Feb
nuke13–100.0614%4 Feb
mirage4–130.0117%4 Feb
dust213–40.1316%4 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0322%3 Feb
nuke13–60.0517%3 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0612%3 Feb
vertigo12–12-0.0011%3 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0914%3 Feb
inferno7–9-0.0711%2 Feb
overpass13–100.0513%2 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0414%2 Feb
nuke8–130.0923%2 Feb
dust212–12-0.0412%1 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0918%1 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.0218%1 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0620%1 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0412%1 Feb
nuke11–1-0.0219%1 Feb
vertigo1–13-0.0820%1 Feb
inferno12–12-0.1013%31 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0116%31 Jan
sanctum9–60.0815%27 Jan
inferno13–60.0115%27 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0213%27 Jan
vertigo13–40.107%27 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0612%27 Jan
overpass13–110.058%27 Jan
poseidon8–8-0.0313%27 Jan
overpass13–4-0.0217%26 Jan
nuke13–30.049%26 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →