Egglord — CS2 Stats

76561198392581554[U:1:432315826]

547Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
913Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate52.4%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy21.3%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.000.99meets
Match win rate29.0%42.9%43.9%14.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEgglordFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning53
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateLWLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression3.6
Utility2.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels0.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.3
Utility2.8
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time670ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–2
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26101638%-0.01
nukeA1811761%-0.00
infernoC1771041%-0.01
anubisC94544%-0.00
ancientC83538%0.00
trainA74357%0.03
dust2S64267%-0.01
overpassA53260%0.01
cache220100%-0.00
agency1010%-0.07
grail110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,725Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
1,914Matches
29.0%Match win rate
52.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
21.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 2 players
2,660MVPs
1,169Hours (in match)
1,364Bombs planted
237Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,348inferno
967nuke
942dust2
311train
172vertigo
56lake
29safehouse
24cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
49%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
87.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
673msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
10.84HE damage / grenade
3.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4572 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0618%29 Aug
mirage13–50.0512%25 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0521%17 Jul
cache13–100.0321%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0724%9 Jul
cache13–9-0.0322%8 May
mirage5–13-0.0814%14 Mar
mirage7–130.0016%1 Mar
inferno16–12-0.0115%1 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0624%19 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0021%16 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0322%14 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0426%14 Feb
dust213–90.0227%14 Feb
mirage9–130.0121%9 Feb
dust213–11-0.0314%9 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0214%9 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0328%13 Dec
agency1–10-0.0722%11 Nov
train10–130.0322%4 Nov
overpass13–70.0419%10 Oct
inferno11–130.0328%10 Oct
overpass3–130.0320%25 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0220%25 Jul
train13–7-0.0323%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0321%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0015%21 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0512%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0022%19 Jul
nuke10–130.0321%18 Jul
overpass13–16-0.0319%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.069%17 Jul
train13–60.0524%17 Jul
overpass13–6-0.0016%17 Jul
nuke13–20.1123%17 Jul
overpass13–100.0223%16 Jul
dust212–16-0.0514%14 Jul
nuke13–10.0622%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0124%14 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0618%12 Jul
inferno7–130.1118%11 Jul
train13–20.0932%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0413%7 Jul
dust26–13-0.0112%7 Jul
grail13–60.0319%7 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0322%2 Jul
train13–70.0421%1 Jul
nuke13–100.0118%1 Jul
mirage16–120.0818%30 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0118%30 Jun
anubis13–160.1020%26 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0022%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0713%24 Jun
inferno8–10.0021%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0834%24 Jun
dust213–110.0127%23 Jun
anubis13–70.0224%23 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0015%19 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0625%19 Jun
dust213–10-0.0117%17 Jun
nuke13–60.0719%17 Jun
inferno10–130.0116%15 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0923%15 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0422%12 Jun
nuke13–6-0.016%12 Jun
inferno13–80.0227%11 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0120%11 Jun
train5–130.0426%4 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0220%4 Jun
nuke13–50.0316%2 Jun
nuke7–130.0323%29 May
inferno11–130.0314%27 May
inferno8–3-0.046%27 May
nuke13–110.0215%27 May
anubis16–120.0025%26 May
mirage15–15-0.0411%24 May
mirage13–90.0637%24 May
ancient7–13-0.0527%20 May
ancient14–160.0030%26 Apr
ancient13–30.0729%26 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0115%23 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0218%18 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0824%8 Apr
mirage13–100.0126%6 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0722%26 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0618%23 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0215%22 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0122%22 Mar
anubis13–50.0414%22 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0417%21 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0426%21 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0113%17 Mar
ancient13–30.0936%16 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0426%15 Mar
ancient13–90.0927%12 Mar
train5–130.0123%12 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0818%10 Mar
mirage14–160.0331%9 Mar
mirage13–90.018%8 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0526%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →