HasseG — CS2 Stats

SE76561198392241945[U:1:431976217]Steam profile ↗

469Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

389Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,463Purple band · top ~22.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#21189 of 37599 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	49.4%	44.0%	44.7%	above
Shot accuracy	14.7%	11.6%	11.9%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.05	1.03	1.04	meets
Match win rate	46.4%	45.1%	45.2%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning51

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7

Aggression5.1

Utility5.7

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.1

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time553ms−68ms

first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms

Headshot accuracy15.6%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–0

13–0Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

11–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	30	14–16	47%	-0.00
inferno	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.01
cache	S	15	10–5	67%	-0.00
anubis	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.01
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.00
ancient	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.03
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,771Lifetime kills

1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players

1,180Matches

46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

49.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players

14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

2,820MVPs

389Hours (in match)

1,431Bombs planted

260Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-476,729

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,459

P2000 / USP-S1,319

MP9971

Glock-18967

Galil AR946

Desert Eagle862

AWP788

FAMAS589

MAC-10367

Lifetime map wins

1,863inferno

989train

939dust2

675nuke

341vertigo

251cbble

95office

28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches

62%Win rate

1.40Avg K/D

—ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	1	0%	0.61	17.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.35	6.0
Mirage	1	0%	0.69	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy

43.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

50.6%Spray accuracy

82.0%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

549msReaction time

31.1%T opening success

54.9%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

4.2%Flash assists

8.84HE damage / grenade

7.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6717% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.0868% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	7–13	-0.02	14%	25 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	26%	23 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	11%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	2%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	12%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.07	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	11%	19 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	14%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.06	11%	19 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	11%	14 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.05	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	17%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	20%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	13%	13 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	20%	12 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	9%	12 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	10%	11 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.08	13%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	5%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	27%	11 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	8%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	24%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	9%	9 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	19%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	30%	7 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	26%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.08	8%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–4	0.04	22%	5 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.10	19%	5 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	14%	2 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.00	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	13%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	14%	16 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	33%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	12%	13 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	11%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	7%	9 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.00	33%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	18%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	20%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.06	19%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	26%	8 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.17	16%	8 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.00	8%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	22%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–11	-0.02	12%	3 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	13%	3 Jul →
overpass	13–6	0.00	31%	1 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	7%	26 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	11%	26 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.08	17%	26 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.06	15%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	14%	23 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	11%	22 Jun →
poseidon	3–9	-0.11	6%	18 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	7%	16 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	31%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	12%	14 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	20%	13 Jun →
anubis	2–11	0.01	10%	13 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.07	8%	13 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.02	11%	13 Jun →
cache	4–13	0.00	23%	12 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	23%	2 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	16%	2 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.01	22%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.02	10%	31 May →
mirage	9–13	0.04	21%	31 May →
inferno	13–6	0.03	19%	31 May →
anubis	13–4	0.02	13%	31 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	12%	31 May →
dust2	13–11	0.00	21%	30 May →
anubis	13–9	0.01	10%	30 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	11%	30 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	27%	30 May →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	11%	30 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	17%	30 May →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	4%	30 May →
nuke	13–4	0.10	14%	28 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	16%	28 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	9%	28 May →
overpass	13–11	-0.09	10%	27 May →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	16%	27 May →
inferno	13–8	0.01	17%	27 May →
nuke	11–13	0.04	19%	27 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	13%	27 May →
mirage	13–3	0.09	17%	27 May →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	20%	26 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	17%	25 May →
overpass	9–13	0.01	17%	25 May →
inferno	16–12	-0.05	15%	22 May →
mirage	13–11	0.03	22%	22 May →