Hamperizh

Hamperizh — CS2 Stats

76561198149087798[U:1:188822070]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,019Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15087 of 38428 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHamperizhFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning35
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50473Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression2.4
Utility6.1
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning3.5
Utility6.1
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time600ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 87% over 15anubisWeakest map · 7% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%0.00
cacheB168850%0.00
infernoS1513287%0.02
anubisD141137%-0.02
nukeS128467%-0.00
ancientB63350%0.01
overpassA53260%-0.02
dust241325%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (7% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

105Matches
56%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage560%1.3314.0
Anubis40%1.0218.3
Vertigo425%0.9616.8
Inferno3100%1.1317.0
Overpass10%1.0014.0
Dust21100%4.3313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
64.5%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
602msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
12.18HE damage / grenade
7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8548% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4948 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.5304% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

7% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0423%29 Aug
cache13–100.0417%29 Aug
anubis8–13-0.058%29 Aug
cache13–11-0.0022%25 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0412%25 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0620%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0015%23 Aug
cache4–13-0.117%23 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0518%23 Aug
cache13–16-0.0118%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0515%22 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0411%22 Aug
anubis11–130.0021%21 Aug
cache13–20.0616%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0120%21 Aug
inferno13–40.009%21 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0313%20 Aug
inferno13–90.0315%20 Aug
cache15–15-0.0213%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0511%14 Aug
cache10–130.0315%14 Aug
nuke13–100.0421%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0616%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0814%12 Aug
cache13–90.0212%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0510%12 Aug
cache13–11-0.0111%11 Aug
anubis11–130.007%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0315%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0616%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0411%8 Aug
inferno13–00.1511%8 Aug
mirage13–30.1012%8 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0310%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0710%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.058%8 Aug
nuke8–130.019%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0510%8 Aug
inferno9–130.0318%7 Aug
cache2–13-0.0317%7 Aug
mirage6–130.029%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0110%7 Aug
ancient13–60.007%19 Jul
nuke3–13-0.080%18 Jul
cache16–120.0412%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0511%18 Jul
mirage1–130.0316%18 Jul
anubis4–130.0214%18 Jul
mirage16–140.0219%17 Jul
inferno16–140.0311%17 Jul
nuke9–13-0.057%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0516%15 Jul
anubis5–130.048%12 Jul
cache4–13-0.0323%12 Jul
cache13–30.0623%9 Jul
cache13–80.0910%9 Jul
cache12–12-0.0116%7 Jul
ancient13–110.0121%6 Jul
nuke13–30.0426%6 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0019%5 Jul
mirage6–130.0115%3 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0512%3 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0410%3 Jul
mirage10–130.0113%3 Jul
overpass13–6-0.0417%1 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0414%26 Jun
mirage9–130.0115%26 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0611%26 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0418%24 Jun
mirage15–150.0712%23 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0410%23 Jun
anubis4–13-0.058%22 Jun
nuke13–90.0220%14 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0313%13 Jun
anubis13–110.0914%13 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0615%13 Jun
dust210–130.0316%13 Jun
mirage13–110.0018%5 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0317%5 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0613%5 Jun
mirage13–80.1113%5 Jun
nuke13–100.0112%5 Jun
anubis9–13-0.115%5 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0311%5 Jun
inferno13–30.035%3 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0418%1 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0119%31 May
mirage9–13-0.028%31 May
inferno13–6-0.0214%31 May
overpass13–30.0516%29 May
anubis10–13-0.049%29 May
dust23–13-0.058%29 May
inferno10–130.0013%29 May
nuke13–40.0815%29 May
inferno16–120.0411%22 May
mirage13–110.0618%22 May
anubis8–13-0.0815%22 May
dust213–80.0112%22 May
nuke13–9-0.018%22 May
ancient8–130.0411%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →