Pudd1ng — CS2 Stats

76561198391207192[U:1:430941464]

1,040Tracked matches56%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,418Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPudd1ngFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning46
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55369Last 10055%Win rateLLLLWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression4.5
Utility4.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — cache 1–2
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 27infernoWeakest map · 53% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB30161453%0.03
dust2A27151256%-0.01
mirageB179853%0.01
nukeA95456%-0.01
ancient43175%0.00
cache43175%0.07
anubis31233%-0.02
train220100%0.04
overpass2020%-0.05
office21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,273Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
4,089Matches
52.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
49.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
13,805MVPs
1,418Hours (in match)
3,760Bombs planted
849Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,935
AWP11,787
FAMAS2,614
MP92,571

Lifetime map wins

15,345inferno
11,482dust2
1,162nuke
531vertigo
69cbble
57train
35office
26ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

211Matches
55%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
79.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5661%1.0816.3
Inferno4862%1.1516.2
Anubis1861%1.2518.2
Ancient1771%1.2717.4
Dust21644%0.9816.4
Nuke425%0.8214.3
Vertigo1100%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
544msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.09HE damage / grenade
3.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.6376 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.4644% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.078%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0313%6 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0317%4 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0430%4 Jul
ancient13–70.0115%3 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0123%3 Jul
inferno11–130.0920%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0118%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.0227%29 Jun
inferno12–120.0120%27 Jun
mirage13–50.0112%27 Jun
inferno11–130.0123%27 Jun
dust213–80.0129%27 Jun
dust213–60.0218%27 Jun
dust213–3-0.0618%27 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0318%25 Jun
dust27–13-0.0426%25 Jun
ancient13–9-0.016%25 Jun
dust28–13-0.0316%23 Jun
mirage13–6-0.039%23 Jun
inferno13–60.038%23 Jun
dust213–10-0.0220%23 Jun
dust27–13-0.0213%23 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0110%22 Jun
mirage13–00.0812%22 Jun
dust214–16-0.0012%22 Jun
inferno5–130.0816%22 Jun
mirage15–150.0215%21 Jun
inferno13–50.0820%21 Jun
anubis13–90.0510%21 Jun
inferno13–10.1311%21 Jun
mirage13–80.0717%21 Jun
nuke13–110.017%21 Jun
dust213–3-0.0415%21 Jun
dust25–13-0.0822%20 Jun
inferno13–110.0211%20 Jun
mirage13–30.069%20 Jun
dust213–30.0211%20 Jun
mirage12–120.0312%19 Jun
inferno13–90.0522%19 Jun
dust211–130.0614%19 Jun
inferno13–80.0415%19 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0412%18 Jun
train4–10.1220%18 Jun
inferno12–120.0514%18 Jun
inferno13–20.047%18 Jun
inferno6–00.2332%18 Jun
dust212–120.0321%18 Jun
mirage1–9-0.0410%18 Jun
nuke10–130.0524%18 Jun
dust213–90.0525%18 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0618%18 Jun
mirage7–13-0.022%16 Jun
mirage13–70.0820%16 Jun
dust211–13-0.0512%15 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0314%15 Jun
dust29–13-0.0110%14 Jun
inferno7–130.0018%14 Jun
dust213–30.0023%14 Jun
inferno13–100.0313%13 Jun
inferno13–80.0817%13 Jun
dust23–13-0.0329%13 Jun
nuke13–80.029%13 Jun
inferno13–40.0311%13 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0113%13 Jun
nuke13–100.0111%13 Jun
dust213–20.068%13 Jun
inferno3–90.0511%13 Jun
overpass4–130.0110%12 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0417%12 Jun
dust213–8-0.0411%7 Jun
mirage13–20.014%7 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0311%7 Jun
cache13–3-0.0314%7 Jun
cache13–6-0.0215%7 Jun
cache1–20.2875%7 Jun
cache13–110.0714%6 Jun
train13–10-0.0411%6 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0115%5 Jun
dust213–7-0.0118%5 Jun
dust213–7-0.0518%5 Jun
ancient16–140.0712%4 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0712%4 Jun
dust216–12-0.0014%4 Jun
mirage8–13-0.038%4 Jun
dust213–50.0314%4 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0115%1 Jun
dust213–7-0.0413%1 Jun
mirage2–13-0.036%24 May
nuke13–11-0.0018%23 May
overpass7–13-0.108%22 May
anubis7–13-0.0711%22 May
mirage7–13-0.0317%22 May
nuke15–15-0.0510%16 May
office9–13-0.0118%16 May
office13–40.0516%16 May
inferno9–50.0517%16 May
inferno13–90.0329%15 May
mirage13–60.0112%10 May
inferno7–90.002%10 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →