Orangotang — CS2 Stats

76561198388242144[U:1:427976416]

910Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,943Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,067Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20326 of 53987 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	57.6%	46.1%	47.0%	above
Shot accuracy	17.9%	12.6%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.05	1.07	above
Match win rate	52.7%	45.7%	46.4%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning56

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD32–64–4Last 10032%Win rateLWWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression7.3

Utility4.9

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time540ms−39ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy20.3%−3.2%

first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.34Best rating — nuke 9–3

13–1Biggest win — nuke

3Longest win streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 10ancientWeakest map · 11% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	19	8–11	42%	0.02
cache	C	17	6–11	35%	0.01
mirage	D	16	3–13	19%	-0.00
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	0.06
inferno	D	11	2–9	18%	0.01
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.05
ancient	D	9	1–8	11%	0.02
overpass	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.01
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.10
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,472Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players

5,857Matches

52.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players

57.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players

17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players

17,375MVPs

2,035Hours (in match)

4,383Bombs planted

1,037Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,901

P2000 / USP-S30,726

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,679

Desert Eagle10,583

P2509,568

AWP9,275

Glock-188,322

SSG 083,483

MP92,532

FAMAS2,428

Lifetime map wins

5,692dust2

5,567inferno

3,033nuke

2,078vertigo

1,955train

641cbble

307office

257lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

115Matches

63%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

86.1ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	12	58%	1.21	20.0
Anubis	11	73%	1.17	17.9
Nuke	6	67%	1.40	15.8
Mirage	5	80%	2.10	19.2
Dust2	3	0%	0.53	8.0
Overpass	2	50%	0.76	13.5
Inferno	1	100%	0.71	12.0
Train	1	0%	0.84	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.3%Spray accuracy

82.1%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

526msReaction time

28.4%T opening success

55.9%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

14.86HE damage / grenade

3.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.4228 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.4208% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	0–4	-0.10	0%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	33%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.07	33%	30 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	13%	31 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	22%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	19%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.03	23%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.04	25%	21 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	17%	21 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.02	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	23%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	18%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	8%	19 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.03	16%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	1–12	-0.04	22%	18 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	28%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.04	27%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	30%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	20%	14 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.10	19%	14 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	17%	13 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.07	17%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	16%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	29%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	24%	12 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.11	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	27%	12 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.03	16%	12 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	16%	12 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.07	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	27%	12 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.08	25%	10 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	29%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	21%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.12	14%	10 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.01	26%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	16%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	27%	7 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	29%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	11%	6 Jul →
overpass	5–13	-0.03	23%	6 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.08	42%	6 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	17%	6 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.01	12%	6 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	36%	5 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	22%	5 Jul →
nuke	9–3	0.34	16%	5 Jul →
poseidon	7–9	0.10	34%	5 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	23%	2 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.04	24%	2 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	18%	2 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.10	28%	2 Jul →
italy	13–5	0.13	28%	2 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	33%	1 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.19	24%	1 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	23%	30 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.07	30%	30 Jun →
ancient	0–13	-0.08	0%	28 Jun →
overpass	9–13	0.01	27%	28 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.01	19%	28 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	23%	26 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.08	16%	26 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.07	27%	26 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	31%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.17	11%	25 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.01	25%	25 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.00	40%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	42%	22 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	17%	9 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.01	23%	9 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	18%	9 Jun →
cache	0–6	-0.04	50%	31 May →
cache	9–13	-0.03	26%	27 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	8%	26 May →
dust2	3–13	0.00	13%	14 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	33%	9 May →
dust2	13–11	0.10	20%	7 May →
mirage	13–7	0.07	18%	6 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.02	19%	1 May →
nuke	13–1	0.07	26%	1 May →
cache	11–13	0.07	13%	30 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.04	47%	30 Apr →
cache	3–12	-0.03	35%	30 Apr →
overpass	11–13	0.02	24%	23 Apr →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	15%	13 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.07	27%	13 Apr →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	6%	13 Apr →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	11%	13 Apr →
anubis	2–13	0.05	18%	12 Apr →
overpass	13–9	-0.00	28%	12 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.00	19%	12 Apr →
inferno	13–16	0.18	23%	11 Apr →
overpass	6–13	-0.04	23%	11 Apr →