L1me

L1me — CS2 Stats

US76561198388182487[U:1:427916759]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,434Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,494Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 Developing
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning57
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45478Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.3
Aggression8.7
Utility5.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time639ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–1
131Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
L8Current streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 14infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28131546%0.01
cacheB22101245%0.02
mirageB147750%0.01
infernoD103730%0.01
nukeD93633%0.02
anubis41325%-0.01
ancient43175%0.01
vertigo41325%0.08
office32167%-0.02
overpass220100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,018Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
2,216Matches
40.0%Match win rate
43.9%Headshot %
4.5%Shot accuracy
3,358MVPs
1,120Hours (in match)
1,678Bombs planted
453Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,020dust2
2,261inferno
1,913nuke
500train
486office
368vertigo
35cbble
17safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

40Matches
45%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
61.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1225%0.5910.0
Dust2757%0.8210.3
Inferno560%0.7910.8
Ancient333%1.0515.3
Vertigo10%0.214.0
Nuke10%0.569.0
Overpass1100%0.5016.0
Anubis1100%1.3013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
67.4%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
629msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
61.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
7.20HE damage / grenade
8.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0732% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0118%7 Aug
dust26–130.0924%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.009%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0221%5 Aug
nuke7–130.0310%5 Aug
nuke0–9-0.1722%5 Aug
inferno5–90.1115%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0720%5 Aug
dust213–50.0815%4 Aug
nuke13–50.0112%28 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0310%24 Jul
dust26–13-0.0312%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0411%24 Jul
dust27–130.0212%24 Jul
cache10–13-0.0114%22 Jul
mirage13–60.0411%21 Jul
dust28–13-0.0313%21 Jul
cache1–13-0.0213%6 Jul
cache1–40.0317%6 Jul
cache13–80.1513%28 Jun
nuke8–130.0425%28 Jun
dust213–110.0115%27 Jun
dust213–10-0.0917%26 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0714%26 Jun
cache7–13-0.0211%26 Jun
dust213–9-0.0013%23 May
cache13–30.0526%23 May
mirage8–13-0.0310%20 May
anubis10–13-0.0018%1 May
cache12–12-0.0024%1 May
anubis13–4-0.0014%30 Apr
anubis0–13-0.0213%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.077%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0210%30 Apr
cache13–70.0413%30 Apr
cache9–130.0110%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0114%29 Apr
cache13–90.0611%29 Apr
cache13–30.0617%29 Apr
cache13–20.0413%29 Apr
cache13–50.047%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0113%29 Apr
cache13–30.138%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0223%29 Apr
cache6–100.1622%29 Apr
cache13–4-0.0014%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.1022%28 Apr
dust213–8-0.028%28 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0510%27 Apr
overpass19–17-0.0715%27 Apr
dust213–40.0521%27 Apr
ancient13–40.007%27 Apr
mirage8–13-0.015%27 Apr
dust213–5-0.0711%27 Apr
dust29–130.0111%26 Apr
nuke13–10.197%26 Apr
inferno13–50.0117%26 Apr
dust22–50.108%25 Apr
mirage16–120.0413%25 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0420%25 Apr
dust213–60.0520%25 Apr
vertigo3–130.0417%25 Apr
inferno7–130.0622%25 Apr
office13–100.0318%24 Apr
office9–13-0.0818%24 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0215%24 Apr
inferno13–40.1114%24 Apr
dust29–130.0122%24 Apr
dust23–13-0.077%20 Apr
ancient13–90.0518%20 Apr
mirage13–10.0927%20 Apr
nuke10–130.0430%20 Apr
ancient13–80.0221%20 Apr
dust212–12-0.0419%20 Apr
vertigo9–20.1843%20 Apr
mirage11–130.0416%19 Apr
dust210–13-0.0114%19 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0114%19 Apr
office13–70.0028%19 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0217%9 Apr
vertigo10–130.1210%9 Apr
inferno3–13-0.095%9 Apr
dust215–15-0.0224%8 Apr
inferno4–130.018%8 Apr
dust213–110.0622%8 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0119%8 Apr
nuke6–13-0.012%8 Apr
dust213–10-0.0213%8 Apr
nuke15–150.0516%8 Apr
inferno13–80.0216%8 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0722%8 Apr
overpass16–130.0418%8 Apr
dust215–15-0.0413%7 Apr
dust213–100.0317%7 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0318%7 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0416%7 Apr
dust213–60.0921%7 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0016%7 Apr
mirage16–130.0814%6 Apr
dust213–30.0914%6 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →