ХРИСТОФОР КОЛЯМБ — CS2 Stats

76561198387509724[U:1:427243996]

1,471Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,693Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,758Purple band · top ~17.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10145 of 18485 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,234 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGХРИСТОФОР КОЛЯМБFACEITLevel 5 · 1,234 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,758 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning43
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression4.0
Utility6.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time635ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy13.9%−6.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–5
131Biggest win — ancient
3Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26141254%-0.03
mirageA2011955%-0.01
infernoC135838%-0.03
anubisD124833%-0.01
nukeC125742%-0.02
ancientA85363%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.05
vertigo1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,777Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
2,622Matches
37.1%Match win rate
41.7%Headshot %
2.4%Shot accuracy
6,720MVPs
1,846Hours (in match)
2,223Bombs planted
417Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,734dust2
2,890inferno
2,875nuke
924vertigo
600train
177office
6ar_shoots
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

538Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
80.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14849%0.9615.5
Dust211950%1.0716.1
Inferno7749%0.9715.0
Anubis6148%0.9815.9
Nuke4835%1.1314.8
Ancient4556%1.0015.2
Overpass1759%0.9413.6
Vertigo1225%0.8414.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
635msReaction time
24.3%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
10.19HE damage / grenade
8.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.708% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3166% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.084%25 Aug
dust213–110.0122%25 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0119%24 Aug
dust23–13-0.078%14 Aug
ancient13–8-0.069%14 Aug
dust213–40.0614%14 Aug
cache13–6-0.045%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0116%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.129%11 Aug
anubis5–13-0.034%11 Aug
nuke13–60.0217%11 Aug
ancient13–10.1025%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0113%11 Aug
dust211–130.037%11 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0213%10 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0313%10 Aug
inferno5–130.0210%10 Aug
inferno13–40.0115%10 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0221%10 Aug
inferno8–3-0.0523%10 Aug
mirage13–110.0227%10 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0713%10 Aug
anubis12–160.0114%7 Aug
nuke13–70.0116%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0213%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.068%7 Aug
dust215–150.0012%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0011%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0219%2 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0715%2 Aug
cache11–130.0217%1 Aug
dust213–10-0.0112%1 Aug
mirage13–100.0317%1 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0432%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0720%1 Aug
ancient13–110.008%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0830%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0413%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.049%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0521%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0711%31 Jul
dust213–90.0413%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0216%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0320%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0213%31 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0524%31 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0410%30 Jul
cache13–4-0.0316%30 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0519%30 Jul
dust213–40.0021%30 Jul
mirage13–10.0321%30 Jul
ancient9–130.0217%30 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0415%30 Jul
anubis13–90.0110%30 Jul
dust213–70.0124%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.1413%17 Jul
cache9–13-0.0826%15 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0718%15 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0027%15 Jul
inferno13–100.0830%15 Jul
nuke7–130.0120%15 Jul
dust213–80.0624%15 Jul
mirage9–130.0823%15 Jul
cache8–13-0.0513%14 Jul
dust28–13-0.038%14 Jul
ancient13–110.0520%14 Jul
nuke9–130.0223%14 Jul
mirage13–20.0012%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0531%14 Jul
mirage13–7-0.039%14 Jul
ancient1–13-0.1222%1 Jul
nuke11–130.0221%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0219%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0326%30 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0525%30 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0815%27 Jun
anubis13–10-0.067%27 Jun
dust213–100.0129%27 Jun
mirage13–50.1121%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.079%27 Jun
dust213–4-0.0428%27 Jun
dust20–4-0.110%27 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0217%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.1019%26 Jun
mirage13–90.0216%26 Jun
dust213–8-0.0414%26 Jun
dust213–70.0029%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0515%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0215%22 Jun
mirage13–80.0326%19 Jun
anubis11–130.0117%19 Jun
inferno13–4-0.1040%19 Jun
anubis13–60.0624%19 Jun
vertigo10–130.0424%13 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0231%13 Jun
cache13–2-0.0344%13 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0224%11 Jun
dust213–9-0.0829%11 Jun
dust213–4-0.036%11 Jun
dust25–13-0.0815%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →