Nanos — CS2 Stats

76561198386083323[U:1:425817595]

518Tracked matches56%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,748Hours in CS67Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,959Purple band · top ~16.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21885 of 44262 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,311 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate50.9%44.7%46.1%above
Shot accuracy10.2%11.9%12.6%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.041.050.13 short
Match win rate41.6%45.2%45.7%4.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNanosFACEITLevel 6 · 1,311 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,959 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning58
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54397Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWLTTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4
Aggression9.7
Utility4.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time532ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — fachwerk 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%0.01
infernoC1761135%0.01
cacheB137654%0.05
dust2S1210283%0.04
overpassA95456%0.04
anubisS76186%0.02
ancientC73443%0.02
nuke31233%0.04
train21150%0.01
poseidon21150%-0.06
vertigo2020%-0.01
office2020%-0.06
fachwerk110100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,147Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,197Matches
41.6%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
10.2%Shot accuracy
5,506MVPs
1,203Hours (in match)
1,571Bombs planted
429Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,286
AWP5,366
SSG 081,241
Knife1,142
P250939
MP9779

Lifetime map wins

2,399dust2
2,114inferno
832nuke
577cbble
330train
202vertigo
195office
123lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

148Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
89.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6349%1.1817.0
Ancient2548%1.0716.2
Inferno1553%1.2218.6
Dust2956%1.1920.7
Nuke667%1.3920.2
Train617%0.9214.0
Overpass683%1.3716.7
Anubis1100%1.4516.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
524msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.92HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4816 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6994% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–13-0.0637%27 Aug
overpass9–130.0217%26 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0113%26 Aug
overpass13–110.0524%25 Aug
overpass13–80.1217%25 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0123%24 Aug
cache15–150.0522%24 Aug
overpass12–120.0237%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0523%21 Aug
dust213–70.1651%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0017%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0532%20 Aug
mirage12–13-0.0231%19 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0035%19 Aug
dust213–80.0135%19 Aug
cache13–70.0541%19 Aug
cache11–13-0.0023%18 Aug
inferno9–130.0525%18 Aug
inferno15–150.0221%17 Aug
cache11–130.0225%17 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0518%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0323%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0530%13 Aug
dust213–10-0.0324%13 Aug
dust213–60.0114%13 Aug
dust213–50.1036%13 Aug
train13–100.0125%12 Aug
train0–60.0125%12 Aug
inferno3–10-0.0521%11 Aug
poseidon9–70.0234%11 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0523%10 Aug
dust213–110.0938%10 Aug
inferno11–130.0420%10 Aug
dust216–13-0.0519%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0516%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0023%9 Aug
anubis13–100.0118%9 Aug
anubis13–40.1116%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0416%6 Aug
anubis13–100.0317%6 Aug
inferno12–12-0.049%4 Aug
mirage13–10.0821%4 Aug
overpass12–120.0925%4 Aug
nuke13–90.1119%4 Aug
inferno13–40.0027%4 Aug
cache16–13-0.0118%4 Aug
inferno13–70.0518%4 Aug
mirage7–130.0730%3 Aug
inferno13–70.0619%3 Aug
cache13–60.0436%2 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0138%1 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0141%1 Aug
cache9–130.0322%27 Jul
ancient6–130.0123%27 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0111%22 Jul
cache9–130.0317%21 Jul
cache13–110.1019%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0622%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0424%21 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0213%20 Jul
dust216–130.0419%17 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1250%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0420%16 Jul
inferno13–70.0622%16 Jul
ancient19–170.0118%16 Jul
ancient13–50.1122%16 Jul
mirage7–130.0326%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0023%15 Jul
dust213–70.0026%15 Jul
ancient13–80.0017%15 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0717%14 Jul
inferno6–13-0.058%14 Jul
cache13–60.0825%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.079%14 Jul
cache13–10.0619%14 Jul
anubis13–50.0816%14 Jul
mirage13–40.0426%14 Jul
mirage13–30.1222%14 Jul
nuke10–130.0624%14 Jul
inferno13–100.0115%14 Jul
inferno7–130.0115%13 Jul
inferno8–130.0326%13 Jul
dust25–130.0524%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0134%13 Jul
dust213–70.0613%13 Jul
office5–13-0.0526%13 Jul
office11–13-0.0619%13 Jul
cache15–150.0523%12 Jul
fachwerk13–20.1924%12 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0434%12 Jul
cache4–00.1445%12 Jul
ancient10–130.0418%11 Jul
ancient4–130.0426%10 Jul
mirage0–130.0118%10 Jul
dust210–13-0.0117%9 Jul
mirage13–50.1024%9 Jul
poseidon1–9-0.1414%8 Jul
overpass13–3-0.0321%8 Jul
overpass13–40.1523%8 Jul
overpass13–20.0214%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →