WhoAmI011

WhoAmI011 — CS2 Stats

76561198373840380[U:1:413574652]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

300Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWhoAmI011FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning34
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateWLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression0.6
Utility2.2
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.4
Utility2.2
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time699ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 699ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+6.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 16–3
160Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
65Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2381535%0.01
infernoB21111052%-0.01
overpassA1811761%-0.00
dust2C83538%-0.00
nukeC73443%-0.03
cacheS64267%0.02
ancientB63350%0.01
anubisD5050%-0.05
train21150%0.07
vertigo2020%-0.04
assembly110100%-0.03
mills110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

283Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
690msReaction time
15.5%T opening success
26.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.65HE damage / grenade
5.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.4523% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–3-0.0124%1 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0618%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0024%31 Jul
ancient13–90.0522%31 Jul
anubis7–130.0431%31 Jul
cache13–5-0.0018%31 Jul
cache1–13-0.1050%2 May
mirage12–16-0.0524%4 Nov
train2–130.1150%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0574%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0316%25 Jul
ancient13–40.0017%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0419%2 Jul
dust24–13-0.1110%30 Jun
mirage15–150.0621%29 Jun
inferno2–9-0.1011%10 Mar
assembly9–6-0.0322%1 Sept
mills13–70.025%27 Jun
overpass13–60.049%19 Feb
nuke4–13-0.154%19 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0510%13 Feb
inferno13–6-0.009%13 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0613%13 Feb
overpass8–130.026%6 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0116%11 Jan
overpass13–50.0821%10 Jan
mirage6–130.0131%10 Jan
vertigo10–13-0.0125%5 Jan
mirage13–20.047%5 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0912%28 Dec
anubis6–13-0.0819%28 Dec
inferno10–13-0.0416%28 Dec
inferno9–5-0.0426%7 Dec
mirage6–13-0.045%14 Nov
overpass13–50.0219%17 Sept
mirage7–130.0416%17 Sept
cache16–50.0119%21 Aug
overpass16–50.0226%21 Aug
vertigo6–16-0.0611%20 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0712%19 Aug
inferno16–140.0421%19 Aug
ancient9–160.0113%19 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0214%14 Aug
mirage14–160.1123%24 Apr
inferno12–160.0514%22 Apr
cache16–30.1729%16 Apr
inferno16–9-0.0813%16 Apr
inferno16–00.1133%16 Apr
mirage12–160.0210%15 Apr
overpass16–30.0113%18 Mar
cache4–160.0413%4 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0429%4 Feb
mirage16–50.0417%21 Jan
overpass16–13-0.0115%24 Nov
dust212–160.1310%31 Aug
train16–100.0420%13 Jun
dust28–8-0.0320%7 Jun
overpass8–16-0.0410%18 Dec
mirage7–16-0.0813%13 Nov
overpass16–14-0.076%13 Nov
overpass7–16-0.0620%10 Oct
inferno16–6-0.0111%2 Oct
nuke16–5-0.090%1 Oct
dust216–10-0.0315%26 Sept
mirage16–50.0020%25 Aug
dust216–100.008%25 Aug
inferno2–160.0018%17 Aug
mirage9–160.0012%26 Jul
dust29–160.0026%25 Jul
inferno16–120.0012%22 Jul
nuke6–160.0013%22 Jul
nuke16–110.0014%13 Jun
dust216–70.0018%29 May
overpass16–90.007%21 May
dust24–160.006%21 May
nuke2–160.0010%21 May
inferno16–100.000%20 May
mirage12–160.0020%20 May
overpass16–110.009%20 May
mirage19–150.0011%19 May
mirage10–160.005%15 May
nuke13–160.0012%15 May
inferno11–160.0012%15 May
overpass10–160.0014%14 May
mirage16–140.0014%14 May
overpass16–130.0015%14 May
mirage10–160.0016%14 May
inferno16–120.0028%14 May
nuke16–40.0011%14 May
inferno16–120.0011%13 May
overpass14–160.0029%13 May
mirage14–160.004%10 May
mirage16–190.0013%8 May
overpass16–140.009%8 May
inferno12–160.0013%8 May
inferno13–160.0026%6 May
ancient16–120.0013%6 May
ancient15–150.0023%5 May
ancient13–160.009%5 May
mirage14–160.0023%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →