HyDraH — CS2 Stats

DE76561198017731799[U:1:57466071]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,209Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,371Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13538 of 53480 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning47

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–40–2Last 10058%Win rateLWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression4.4

Utility6.6

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels0.1

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning4.7

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time583ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms

Headshot accuracy23.2%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — poseidon 9–3

13–1Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17dust2Weakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	17	12–5	71%	0.01
cache	A	16	9–7	56%	0.00
dust2	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.01
inferno	S	15	10–5	67%	0.02
poseidon	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.02
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.00
ancient	S	7	5–2	71%	0.05
mirage	—	4	3–1	75%	0.00
debris	—	4	2–2	50%	0.06
eldorado	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

647Matches

52%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

76.2ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	44	52%	1.08	15.0
Ancient	27	52%	1.02	15.3
Nuke	25	56%	1.22	16.6
Anubis	20	50%	1.02	16.9
Dust2	12	50%	1.00	16.7
Cache	9	44%	1.02	15.4
Vertigo	7	57%	1.13	14.6
Mirage	1	100%	1.15	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.8%Spray accuracy

85.1%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

568msReaction time

25.7%T opening success

34.8%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

11.2%Flash assists

9.84HE damage / grenade

7.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.714% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
poseidon	5–9	-0.08	15%	30 Aug →
poseidon	9–5	0.04	21%	30 Aug →
poseidon	9–6	0.03	23%	30 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	24%	28 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	20%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	19%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	35%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	13%	27 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	11%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.07	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	24%	27 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.00	17%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	25%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.06	20%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	16%	26 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.02	33%	25 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	15%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.06	24%	25 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.10	34%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	36%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.12	40%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	20%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	60%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.06	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.06	22%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	23%	21 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	28%	15 Aug →
train	8–13	-0.08	23%	15 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.02	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	17%	15 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	30%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	9%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	21%	14 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	19%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	9%	13 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	22%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.00	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.08	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	7%	10 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	21%	10 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	12%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	22%	5 Aug →
poseidon	4–9	-0.21	19%	5 Aug →
debris	9–3	0.10	14%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	27%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	7%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	23%	4 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.07	45%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	16%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	18%	3 Aug →
poseidon	3–9	-0.08	27%	3 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	17%	3 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	25%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	31%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	16%	2 Aug →
cache	19–16	-0.02	16%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	23%	1 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	36%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	24%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	18%	31 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.08	15%	24 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.08	3%	24 Jul →
poseidon	9–3	0.17	19%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	21%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	28%	21 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	15%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.11	16%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.03	27%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	17%	20 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	21%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.07	20%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	38%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.05	23%	17 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.12	30%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	24%	17 Jul →
poseidon	7–9	-0.07	17%	17 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.14	21%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	35%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	28%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	29%	15 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.03	24%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	31%	15 Jul →
eldorado	9–5	-0.02	23%	15 Jul →
boulder	13–10	-0.02	7%	10 Jul →
poseidon	9–6	0.06	24%	10 Jul →
eldorado	9–5	-0.01	26%	10 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.08	19%	10 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	15%	9 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.10	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.09	23%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.10	30%	9 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	21%	9 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	23%	9 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.06	32%	8 Jul →