eLOOO

eLOOO — CS2 Stats

DE76561198006815963[U:1:46550235]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,696Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,165Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11815 of 56778 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeLOOOFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,165 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning49
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43543Last 10043%Win rateWWLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.9
Utility6.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time588ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–1
131Biggest win — inferno
3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 52% over 23ancientWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB23121152%0.02
ancientC2281436%0.00
nukeC167944%0.02
dust2C156940%0.01
anubisC125742%-0.01
mirageC94544%0.03
cache2020%0.01
overpass110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,040Matches
51%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
78.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1741%1.0614.5
Nuke1638%1.0314.4
Inferno1267%1.3716.8
Dust2838%1.1620.0
Vertigo743%1.1015.7
Ancient633%1.0716.8
Overpass250%1.2617.5
Mirage2100%1.5622.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
588msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
11.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4788% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0231%4 Jun
ancient13–70.0513%4 Jun
anubis2–13-0.068%3 Jun
nuke11–130.0327%3 Jun
dust24–13-0.0120%3 Jun
nuke13–30.1323%3 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0516%2 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0515%2 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0226%1 Jun
ancient11–130.0524%1 Jun
dust213–90.0122%1 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0325%1 Jun
inferno13–30.1035%30 May
dust216–140.0518%30 May
anubis13–60.0420%30 May
inferno10–130.0814%30 May
nuke15–150.0127%30 May
ancient4–130.0018%29 May
inferno13–50.1138%29 May
mirage13–60.0218%29 May
ancient6–130.0124%29 May
nuke13–110.0330%29 May
dust213–80.0640%29 May
nuke13–50.0116%29 May
anubis11–13-0.0124%29 May
anubis13–50.0724%27 May
nuke13–20.1124%27 May
ancient11–13-0.0425%27 May
inferno7–13-0.0424%27 May
mirage8–13-0.0619%27 May
dust213–90.0118%26 May
ancient11–130.0127%26 May
inferno13–10.1426%26 May
dust22–13-0.0241%24 May
ancient3–13-0.0813%24 May
ancient13–90.1228%23 May
nuke5–130.0424%22 May
inferno13–40.0142%22 May
ancient13–60.0112%22 May
cache10–13-0.0124%22 May
nuke13–100.0331%22 May
ancient13–70.0230%21 May
mirage13–80.1225%21 May
nuke11–130.0317%21 May
inferno13–90.0331%21 May
ancient10–13-0.016%20 May
anubis16–140.0420%20 May
mirage8–13-0.0128%20 May
ancient11–130.0018%20 May
dust213–50.0438%19 May
inferno15–150.0227%19 May
nuke2–13-0.0223%19 May
cache10–130.0424%19 May
anubis10–13-0.0119%18 May
ancient13–70.0823%18 May
inferno13–80.0020%18 May
dust210–13-0.0031%17 May
inferno8–130.0428%17 May
anubis10–130.0118%17 May
anubis13–100.0110%17 May
ancient9–13-0.0619%16 May
mirage13–160.0126%16 May
inferno13–70.0826%16 May
inferno6–13-0.0113%16 May
dust214–160.0123%16 May
overpass16–120.0421%15 May
dust27–13-0.0033%15 May
inferno13–110.0130%15 May
nuke13–100.0225%15 May
ancient5–130.0323%15 May
dust213–16-0.0114%15 May
anubis9–13-0.0711%15 May
inferno9–13-0.0524%15 May
ancient6–13-0.0531%15 May
nuke4–13-0.0317%15 May
mirage13–60.0917%12 May
ancient4–13-0.0524%12 May
inferno3–13-0.0514%11 May
inferno13–110.0131%11 May
nuke11–130.0216%11 May
anubis13–7-0.0515%11 May
dust213–11-0.0220%9 May
inferno13–60.0438%9 May
dust27–13-0.0232%9 May
ancient13–7-0.0423%9 May
ancient11–130.0320%8 May
nuke13–60.0629%8 May
inferno2–13-0.0019%8 May
dust211–130.0416%8 May
mirage7–130.0422%8 May
ancient13–10-0.0123%7 May
inferno13–80.1141%7 May
nuke15–15-0.0429%7 May
anubis3–13-0.0431%7 May
dust211–130.0534%6 May
ancient13–90.0020%6 May
inferno13–10-0.0115%5 May
mirage5–130.0222%5 May
inferno10–13-0.0511%4 May
inferno8–130.0135%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →