rubeneves — CS2 Stats

PT76561198360345260[U:1:400079532]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,204Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,629Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19066 of 55234 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,325 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning44

Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7

Aggression7.0

Utility8.0

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch3.4

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning4.4

Utility8.0

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time583ms−30ms

first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms

Headshot accuracy15.1%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

13–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 10nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	25	14–11	56%	-0.00
mirage	C	24	10–14	42%	-0.00
ancient	S	19	13–6	68%	-0.02
dust2	S	10	8–2	80%	0.03
cache	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.03
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
overpass	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.06
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

566Matches

53%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

78.5ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	64	59%	1.06	14.7
Dust2	47	43%	0.97	14.1
Ancient	37	54%	1.02	15.9
Inferno	31	58%	1.08	14.0
Anubis	13	54%	0.76	13.1
Cache	12	75%	1.10	14.8
Nuke	7	57%	0.99	16.0
Overpass	5	20%	0.61	11.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy

40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

84.3%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

580msReaction time

38.7%T opening success

39.5%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

8.1%Flash assists

14.35HE damage / grenade

16.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.6967% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–8	0.02	9%	26 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.02	8%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	9%	24 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	23%	23 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.00	8%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	11%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	16%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	18%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.08	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	19%	6 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	19%	29 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	18%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.00	14%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.01	44%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.05	14%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	7%	24 Jul →
mirage	0–2	-0.02	0%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.00	13%	23 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	17%	23 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	25%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	30%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	13%	21 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	15%	20 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.04	11%	13 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	6%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.00	12%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	10%	13 Jul →
dust2	1–13	0.03	23%	10 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.07	15%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	9%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.07	4%	9 Jul →
inferno	2–9	-0.10	18%	9 Jul →
nuke	9–7	0.01	13%	9 Jul →
nuke	7–9	-0.01	7%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	21%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	10%	2 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	19%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	19%	26 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	9%	25 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	11%	24 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	29%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.02	7%	24 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.14	36%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.03	18%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.02	22%	18 Jun →
ancient	13–16	-0.09	3%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.06	20%	14 Jun →
ancient	14–16	-0.03	18%	3 Jun →
ancient	16–13	0.05	6%	3 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	14%	3 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	13%	3 Jun →
vertigo	3–9	-0.03	3%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	12%	28 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	3%	28 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	18%	28 May →
anubis	15–15	0.05	21%	27 May →
inferno	6–13	0.02	13%	23 May →
dust2	13–4	0.13	11%	23 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	5%	23 May →
inferno	13–10	0.08	17%	20 May →
inferno	11–13	0.06	17%	20 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	13%	16 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	14%	16 May →
ancient	13–4	0.02	6%	16 May →
dust2	13–11	0.01	6%	15 May →
mirage	13–10	0.05	12%	15 May →
mirage	13–11	0.03	14%	13 May →
overpass	5–9	-0.16	14%	13 May →
inferno	13–9	0.03	12%	13 May →
overpass	9–13	0.00	6%	13 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	16%	6 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	25%	6 May →
dust2	13–10	0.00	30%	6 May →
inferno	5–9	-0.01	23%	5 May →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	10%	4 May →
overpass	15–15	-0.01	23%	4 May →
mirage	8–13	0.07	10%	1 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	23%	1 May →
dust2	13–8	0.05	18%	1 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	22%	29 Apr →
cache	13–6	-0.02	3%	29 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	9%	28 Apr →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	12%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.11	21%	28 Apr →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	13%	25 Apr →
mirage	12–16	-0.05	16%	25 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.01	10%	24 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	10%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	20%	24 Apr →
overpass	13–10	-0.06	20%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	21%	21 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	18%	21 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	14%	21 Apr →
inferno	9–5	0.05	19%	13 Apr →