Soap

Soap — CS2 Stats

CD76561198351908101[U:1:391642373]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

415Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
901Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning54
Utility7

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46477Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression9.1
Utility0.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.4
Utility0.7
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time669ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 713ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–2
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 56% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C34151944%-0.03
mirageC2191243%-0.01
nukeC104640%-0.02
overpassA95456%-0.02
ancientC83538%0.00
infernoD62433%-0.02
anubis31233%-0.04
vertigo32167%-0.01
cache21150%0.03
train220100%0.03
office110100%0.02
grail110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,055Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
1,210Matches
45.3%Match win rate
42.0%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
2,721MVPs
901Hours (in match)
586Bombs planted
301Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,495dust2
1,052inferno
571nuke
298vertigo
198train
96office
50lake
44cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
67%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
67.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
661msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.15Enemies flashed / flash
1.1%Flash assists
5.79HE damage / grenade
0.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1492 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5227% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.1021%17 Jul
dust27–130.0137%3 Jun
mirage13–80.0323%3 Jun
dust27–13-0.0129%3 Jun
mirage2–13-0.017%3 Jun
dust211–13-0.0221%2 Jun
inferno13–60.0314%30 May
mirage3–13-0.0414%29 May
dust213–110.0613%29 May
dust21–3-0.090%28 May
cache13–110.0724%25 May
nuke3–13-0.0823%17 May
dust22–13-0.1222%16 May
overpass13–80.0115%16 May
office13–40.028%12 May
anubis11–13-0.066%12 May
dust213–20.1017%12 May
ancient13–50.0819%11 May
overpass16–130.0414%11 May
mirage13–160.0020%11 May
dust25–110.0528%11 May
nuke13–6-0.0346%10 May
dust21–13-0.0322%10 May
mirage9–13-0.0639%10 May
dust213–80.045%7 May
cache11–13-0.019%7 May
overpass13–11-0.0311%3 Apr
mirage13–60.0932%11 Mar
dust213–100.0016%16 Feb
ancient11–130.0330%10 Feb
mirage13–90.0013%8 Feb
nuke13–60.0014%8 Feb
overpass2–13-0.1023%14 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0412%5 Nov
nuke13–20.0463%4 Nov
dust213–90.0432%4 Nov
dust27–40.0012%4 Nov
ancient12–120.0222%4 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0521%4 Nov
dust213–9-0.0518%9 Sept
dust22–13-0.0931%9 Sept
train13–3-0.0217%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0030%7 Aug
overpass13–60.0232%7 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0650%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0822%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0829%6 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0116%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0431%6 Aug
ancient7–130.0435%6 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0243%6 Aug
dust213–5-0.0633%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0341%6 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0223%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0417%6 Aug
dust215–15-0.0230%5 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0317%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0625%5 Aug
dust213–80.0011%5 Aug
dust23–130.0133%5 Aug
overpass4–13-0.0422%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.019%4 Aug
mirage1–13-0.068%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0433%23 Jul
anubis13–40.0218%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0336%23 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.0536%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.065%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0322%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.0121%23 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0940%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0620%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0616%20 Jul
mirage13–80.0132%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0320%20 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0216%20 Jul
dust21–13-0.1029%20 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0220%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.1114%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.1011%17 Jul
dust213–6-0.0535%17 Jul
dust213–5-0.0325%17 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0423%15 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.0547%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0214%14 Jul
dust213–10-0.0234%14 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0038%14 Jul
ancient13–5-0.057%10 Jul
inferno8–8-0.106%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0427%10 Jul
dust213–90.0230%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0221%9 Jul
vertigo9–130.0524%9 Jul
mirage13–60.0148%9 Jul
overpass13–60.0021%8 Jul
nuke12–120.0224%8 Jul
inferno13–50.0412%8 Jul
train13–20.0731%8 Jul
grail13–5-0.0417%7 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0723%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →