trash

trash — CS2 Stats

76561198347643045[U:1:387377317]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

143Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,139Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,675Purple band · top ~9.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6509 of 13632 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtrashFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER19,675 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning48
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38334Last 7551%Win rateWLLLWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.7
Aggression5.7
Utility4.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time660ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 75 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–2
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%-0.01
dust2B178947%-0.02
nukeB158753%-0.03
ancientS118373%-0.01
cache21150%-0.02
anubis21150%-0.05
vertigo21150%-0.02
train21150%-0.00
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 75 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,965Lifetime kills
0.54K/D
2,015Matches
24.7%Match win rate
38.0%Headshot %
12.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
1,731MVPs
997Hours (in match)
1,134Bombs planted
233Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,897dust2
802inferno
759nuke
400train
359vertigo
92office
88cbble
84lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
47%Win rate
0.67Avg K/D
55.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%0.609.7
Dust2450%0.539.8
Ancient367%0.8110.7
Inferno250%1.1218.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
26.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
645msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.87HE damage / grenade
10.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4492 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5857% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0715%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0727%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0329%2 May
mirage6–130.0111%2 May
mirage9–10.1018%2 May
cache9–13-0.0214%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.0214%30 Apr
mirage13–0-0.0114%10 Apr
anubis12–12-0.0614%10 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0427%10 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0313%10 Apr
vertigo11–130.0528%10 Apr
nuke13–40.0215%9 Apr
vertigo13–11-0.1012%8 Apr
nuke8–80.0612%8 Apr
mirage6–130.0034%3 Apr
ancient13–90.0422%28 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0913%28 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0813%11 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0423%11 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0221%10 Feb
dust21–13-0.1114%10 Feb
dust212–120.0122%10 Feb
dust27–13-0.0517%10 Feb
nuke6–130.0124%9 Feb
dust20–5-0.10100%8 Feb
ancient13–20.1127%8 Feb
mirage13–80.0520%7 Feb
mirage13–100.0312%7 Feb
dust213–70.0329%7 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0513%7 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0513%5 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0712%5 Feb
dust213–8-0.0219%5 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0818%5 Feb
mirage7–13-0.019%4 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0014%4 Feb
dust213–11-0.0721%4 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0632%3 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0621%1 Feb
nuke3–11-0.0615%31 Jan
dust213–30.0217%31 Jan
dust213–11-0.0331%31 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0810%29 Jan
dust213–60.0230%29 Jan
dust25–13-0.0521%29 Jan
dust23–13-0.028%29 Jan
ancient2–13-0.0817%28 Jan
dust211–13-0.0232%28 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0819%28 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0820%28 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0313%27 Jan
dust24–13-0.0910%27 Jan
dust213–110.0518%27 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0023%27 Jan
ancient13–100.0010%26 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0219%26 Jan
ancient13–110.0319%26 Jan
nuke13–9-0.0411%25 Jan
dust213–70.0738%25 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0623%25 Jan
mirage11–130.0316%24 Jan
ancient13–90.0324%23 Jan
mirage13–50.0233%23 Jan
mirage3–130.0634%22 Jan
mirage8–10-0.0264%15 Jan
mirage10–8-0.0118%12 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0418%12 Jan
mirage13–20.0111%11 Jan
office12–12-0.0118%16 Mar
train13–50.0223%16 Mar
dust24–130.0523%16 Mar
train5–13-0.0312%15 Mar
mirage5–160.0015%31 Dec
mirage16–90.0024%20 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →