Poarcele

Poarcele — CS2 Stats

GB76561198343092846[U:1:382827118]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,443Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,498Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPoarceleFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning34
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49429Last 10049%Win rateTWLLLLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim4.2
Aggression2.4
Utility7.3
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning3.4
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time616ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 718ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–2
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 85% over 13infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB25131252%-0.00
officeC2081240%-0.03
mirageS1311285%-0.01
infernoD123925%-0.00
dust2A116555%-0.02
nukeC52340%-0.01
ancient43175%-0.01
overpass330100%-0.02
shelter2020%-0.07
anubis2020%-0.00
train1010%-0.05
italy1010%-0.02
alpine1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,563Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
5,339Matches
44.8%Match win rate
51.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.4%Shot accuracy
14,062MVPs
2,410Hours (in match)
11,138Bombs planted
1,408Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,034
AWP10,493
FAMAS3,716
MAC-103,009
P2502,787

Lifetime map wins

9,209inferno
7,326dust2
3,237nuke
2,003train
1,571vertigo
1,458office
704cbble
51italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

300Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
69.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1759%0.9813.8
Anubis1675%0.9113.3
Nuke1070%0.8814.4
Ancient967%1.0015.4
Vertigo367%0.9714.0
Inferno2100%1.8819.5
Train250%0.445.5
Dust21100%0.8511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
26.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
610msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
27.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
13.42HE damage / grenade
17.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2475% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office12–12-0.0815%27 Aug
dust213–80.0825%27 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0024%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.086%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0716%26 Aug
office9–13-0.0811%25 Aug
shelter12–12-0.0621%25 Aug
office13–60.0227%23 Aug
office13–7-0.0221%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0423%18 Aug
office11–130.0022%18 Aug
office5–13-0.0718%15 Aug
train12–12-0.0532%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0120%11 Aug
office11–13-0.0715%10 Aug
inferno10–130.0111%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0023%5 Aug
office7–13-0.0614%5 Aug
office12–12-0.0116%4 Aug
office13–10-0.0226%29 Jul
office13–110.0925%29 Jul
shelter8–13-0.0712%29 Jul
cache7–130.0122%29 Jul
office7–13-0.0621%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.0417%26 Jul
office6–13-0.0315%26 Jul
office10–130.0715%17 Jul
cache13–20.0623%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.1124%15 Jul
dust20–5-0.0133%15 Jul
office13–11-0.0017%8 Jul
office13–8-0.0023%8 Jul
cache13–10-0.0515%8 Jul
cache1–13-0.040%6 Jul
mirage13–20.0312%5 Jul
cache13–30.0016%5 Jul
cache6–130.0116%5 Jul
cache13–6-0.0214%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0219%5 Jul
inferno8–130.0120%24 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0737%24 Jun
cache13–70.0424%24 Jun
cache13–50.0722%24 Jun
cache7–13-0.0413%21 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0021%21 Jun
ancient13–40.0120%21 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0221%21 Jun
nuke8–80.0215%20 Jun
mirage12–80.1128%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0331%19 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0320%19 Jun
mirage13–100.0222%18 Jun
cache13–20.0026%18 Jun
cache13–80.0225%18 Jun
cache13–10-0.0125%17 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0615%17 Jun
cache13–40.0215%16 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0222%16 Jun
dust29–13-0.0720%13 Jun
ancient13–20.0117%13 Jun
anubis3–100.0415%13 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0235%12 Jun
cache13–20.1616%12 Jun
cache13–10-0.0513%11 Jun
italy2–13-0.0228%11 Jun
alpine12–12-0.039%11 Jun
office9–13-0.019%8 Jun
cache5–13-0.0013%1 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0418%1 Jun
cache2–90.0242%31 May
inferno13–30.0632%29 May
mirage13–9-0.0230%29 May
ancient13–8-0.0214%29 May
nuke13–10-0.0223%29 May
inferno4–130.0111%27 May
mirage13–4-0.0260%27 May
inferno9–13-0.013%25 May
mirage5–13-0.0811%25 May
dust213–90.0112%25 May
dust213–6-0.0317%22 May
dust213–6-0.0331%21 May
ancient10–13-0.0415%21 May
overpass13–60.0027%21 May
overpass16–12-0.0117%18 May
mirage11–13-0.0317%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0541%18 May
cache8–130.034%17 May
office12–12-0.1110%13 May
mirage13–9-0.0713%11 May
dust216–12-0.0124%11 May
office13–9-0.0621%11 May
inferno13–110.0836%10 May
cache9–130.0020%10 May
cache2–13-0.0814%10 May
office13–10-0.0432%8 May
mirage13–110.0616%8 May
cache12–12-0.0615%5 May
cache12–12-0.0519%4 May
cache13–00.0719%2 May
inferno9–13-0.0326%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →