Jones — CS2 Stats

76561198335134943[U:1:374869215]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

148Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,768Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,731Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13346 of 58256 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,670), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	44.4%	46.0%	47.0%	2.6% short
Shot accuracy	20.1%	12.6%	12.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.26	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	44.1%	45.8%	46.4%	2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning51

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–44–7Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression6.8

Utility4.3

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.1

Utility4.3

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time524ms−113ms

first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms

Headshot accuracy13.1%−4.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 16–6

16–1Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

6–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	28	15–13	54%	0.05
cache	B	20	10–10	50%	0.06
dust2	C	16	7–9	44%	0.03
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.05
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.06
ancient	—	3	3–0	100%	0.05
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	0.00
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

131,881Lifetime kills

1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players

4,313Matches

44.1%Match win rate

44.4%Headshot %

20.1%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 7 players

20,650MVPs

1,910Hours (in match)

3,344Bombs planted

3,411Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,097

M4A4 / M4A1-S23,351

AWP14,062

P2000 / USP-S9,623

Desert Eagle9,481

SG 5534,969

Glock-184,430

AUG3,234

UMP-451,727

P2501,333

Lifetime map wins

6,651inferno

6,496dust2

4,187train

2,207nuke

1,230vertigo

624cbble

159office

126lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

459Matches

54%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

101.2ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	1	100%	1.75	21.0
Mirage	1	100%	2.18	24.0
Cache	1	100%	1.50	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.0%Headshot accuracy

39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.8%Spray accuracy

78.0%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

518msReaction time

31.8%T opening success

48.1%CT opening success

0.32Enemies flashed / flash

2.1%Flash assists

10.38HE damage / grenade

4.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.0164% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3192 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.7504% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	14–16	0.11	16%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	8%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	8%	24 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.07	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	35%	24 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.06	12%	22 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	15%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.09	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	17%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	9%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	12–2	0.02	11%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	2%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	15%	20 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	10%	19 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	10%	17 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.08	7%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	21%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.13	11%	15 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	19%	14 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.15	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	10%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.12	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	11%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	3%	8 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	6%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.12	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	14%	8 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.16	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.09	22%	2 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	10%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.04	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.04	14%	2 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.01	6%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.07	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	8–8	0.01	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.12	21%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.11	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	5%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.09	10%	10 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.08	14%	9 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.09	23%	9 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	23%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.08	14%	9 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.05	13%	8 Jul →
dust2	1–4	-0.01	11%	8 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	18%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.16	17%	8 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	0.09	18%	8 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.10	13%	8 Jul →
mirage	3–1	0.18	21%	8 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.00	17%	24 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	24%	24 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.02	24%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	19%	23 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.00	22%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	19%	25 Oct →
mirage	3–13	0.01	20%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	16%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.11	20%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.00	9%	24 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.08	7%	23 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.01	21%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.02	18%	23 Sept →
overpass	2–13	-0.06	22%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.05	15%	5 May →
dust2	11–13	0.01	19%	30 Apr →
vertigo	13–3	0.08	24%	30 Apr →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	21%	30 Apr →
inferno	6–0	0.06	25%	30 Apr →
overpass	8–13	0.12	16%	27 Dec →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	5%	27 Dec →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	16%	3 Dec →
mirage	10–13	0.02	30%	3 Dec →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	17%	1 Dec →
inferno	13–6	0.16	13%	1 Dec →
overpass	3–13	-0.05	27%	28 Nov →
nuke	13–11	0.03	14%	19 Nov →
vertigo	13–4	0.10	25%	1 Sept →
mirage	16–8	0.07	21%	30 Aug →
cache	9–1	0.12	22%	30 Aug →
cache	9–1	0.06	38%	30 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.11	17%	30 Aug →
inferno	16–5	0.02	7%	25 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.02	21%	25 Aug →
cache	6–16	-0.02	3%	24 Aug →
cache	8–8	0.04	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	16–7	0.02	22%	20 Aug →
cache	16–1	0.05	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–16	0.04	12%	20 Aug →
cache	16–6	0.19	13%	20 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.08	10%	19 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.03	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–6	0.06	12%	18 Aug →
inferno	16–5	0.11	9%	13 Aug →