Particle in Box

Particle in Box — CS2 Stats

76561198318983148[U:1:358717420]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

598Tracked matches67%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
FaceitLevel 3 · 826 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGParticle in BoxFACEITLevel 3 · 826 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning47
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52426Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression6.6
Utility2.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.7
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time644ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–2
130Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 88% over 8infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1710759%-0.00
mirageB168850%-0.01
ancientS118373%-0.00
dust2D103730%-0.00
anubisS96367%0.01
officeS87188%0.01
overpassD72529%-0.03
infernoD51420%-0.04
cache41325%-0.07
alpine32167%-0.02
vertigo21150%-0.04
train21150%-0.06
warden2020%0.03
stronghold21150%0.01
shelter110100%-0.01
sanctum1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
68%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage978%0.9214.4
Anubis580%1.1315.8
Inferno20%0.6713.5
Dust2250%0.7014.5
Nuke1100%2.8014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
642msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
7.74HE damage / grenade
4.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1332% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3177 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9269% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo6–13-0.068%26 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0511%26 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0119%16 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0211%11 Jul
ancient13–11-0.088%11 Jul
nuke13–7-0.027%11 Jul
mirage13–40.1116%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0313%21 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0213%30 May
nuke13–9-0.019%17 May
cache10–13-0.0712%11 May
cache13–11-0.078%5 May
cache5–13-0.088%4 May
cache4–13-0.0518%4 May
anubis13–7-0.0412%5 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0111%5 Apr
anubis13–50.1114%5 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0012%5 Apr
office13–80.0318%5 Apr
office13–70.0223%5 Apr
office13–10.0624%5 Apr
office13–4-0.056%4 Apr
office13–60.0629%26 Mar
office13–110.0114%26 Mar
vertigo13–6-0.019%25 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0018%14 Mar
mirage4–100.0119%7 Mar
overpass9–13-0.047%26 Feb
anubis13–40.038%26 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0713%23 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0214%17 Feb
ancient13–1-0.053%16 Feb
office12–12-0.0224%16 Feb
ancient13–10.0411%14 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0313%14 Feb
nuke13–20.1133%14 Feb
ancient13–90.005%7 Feb
train13–9-0.0315%7 Feb
alpine13–10.077%6 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0010%2 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0514%2 Feb
ancient5–13-0.009%1 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0212%1 Feb
ancient13–50.0415%1 Feb
nuke8–13-0.044%1 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0521%1 Feb
anubis11–130.049%1 Feb
dust212–12-0.068%31 Jan
dust28–130.0119%31 Jan
mirage10–130.0118%31 Jan
nuke13–4-0.006%31 Jan
mirage12–12-0.094%31 Jan
dust24–13-0.0519%31 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0324%31 Jan
alpine5–13-0.0615%29 Jan
dust211–130.0219%27 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0221%27 Jan
overpass8–10.0318%27 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0733%27 Jan
warden7–13-0.0418%26 Jan
stronghold4–13-0.0315%26 Jan
dust213–6-0.0421%26 Jan
office8–1-0.0240%26 Jan
anubis8–13-0.0211%25 Jan
nuke11–130.0410%25 Jan
inferno7–13-0.057%25 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0215%25 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0412%25 Jan
overpass3–13-0.0412%25 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0710%25 Jan
mirage13–60.0143%25 Jan
dust212–12-0.0117%25 Jan
dust213–8-0.0118%25 Jan
dust28–13-0.0116%24 Jan
overpass3–100.028%24 Jan
dust23–130.026%24 Jan
sanctum8–8-0.1014%24 Jan
warden10–130.109%24 Jan
alpine13–3-0.069%24 Jan
stronghold13–60.0615%24 Jan
mirage2–130.0326%24 Jan
anubis13–0-0.036%19 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0017%18 Jan
nuke13–00.088%18 Jan
inferno14–16-0.039%18 Jan
anubis13–90.0115%18 Jan
dust213–20.1110%18 Jan
ancient10–130.0215%18 Jan
nuke13–6-0.013%18 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0214%18 Jan
mirage13–90.0122%17 Jan
nuke6–130.0113%17 Jan
train4–13-0.096%17 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0912%17 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0621%17 Jan
overpass13–10-0.0215%17 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0224%16 Jan
ancient13–60.0315%16 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0613%16 Jan
ancient13–60.0817%15 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →